On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 07:15:26PM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > Hi! > > What is "Those packages could not be parsed because of their source > format (e.g. an asterisk is put after packages in dbs format), [...]" > supposed to mean (templates/todo.wml), and likewise "Those packages are > either not i18n-ed or stored in an unparseable format, e.g. an asterisk > is put after packages in dbs format, which may then contain localized > files." in the po/todo.wml file? > > I kind of get a parse error there when I try to make any sense of it > (and that makes it a bit hard to translate...)
Well, this may be poor English wording, improvements are welcome :) What I had in mind is that dbs suck when dealing with automatic extraction of files, because there is no way to get them without building the package. Without this sentence, some people would file bugreports because a given package is already i18n-ed, but w.d.o/intl/l10n/ tells it is not. So I am willing to acknowledge that i18n detection could fail under some circumstances, e.g. with packages in dbs format. Denis
