On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 12:09:16PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> This seems like a great plan, we should implement at least the top
> level very quickly so the website has a new look to go with the new
> release.
There's no rush in that case, I'm afraid :)
--
2. That which causes joy or hap
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 05:54:46PM -0800, Tor Slettnes wrote:
> Is the 'makelinks.sh' script in search.debian.org run automatically
> (through Cron or otherwise)?
Looks like it isn't. Craig should know, he set that one up.
> If not, could someone run it? (To add Norwegian search)
Sure, done.
-
* "James A. Treacy"
| So they are called frisbees in AU also.
FWIW, in .no as well.
| The proper term is actually flying disc (frisbee is a trademark of
| Wham-O).
Probably in the same sense as «Thermos» is a trademark og Thermos and
(at least in .no) «Primus» is a trademark of Primus, while i
Hi!
What is "Those packages could not be parsed because of their source
format (e.g. an asterisk is put after packages in dbs format), [...]"
supposed to mean (templates/todo.wml), and likewise "Those packages are
either not i18n-ed or stored in an unparseable format, e.g. an asterisk
is put after
Denis Barbier:
>> Directory /cvs/webwml/webwml/danish/international/l10n/data
> this directory is useless.
Which directories should be translated? Could you please put a README
file in english/international/l10n with information on which files
should and which files should not be translated?
--
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2001 21:28:07 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 123059 minor
Bug#123059: release/index: missing `testing' in `frozen'
Severity set to `minor'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
severity 100148 wishlist
thanks
I just noticed that we would lose the nice ability to easily count how many
people switch to a different mirror if we moved to a system that doesn't
include invoking the CGI. So, since there are two cons to implementing this
after all (the other being the increase i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 100148 wishlist
Bug#100148: the mirror list shouldn't invoke the CGI on cgi.debian.org
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Hi,
It would be good if someone provided a thorough list of things we'd have to
change. It's not like me and other fifty or so people who edit the web pages
can't go to w3.org and read the 46 pages (+ the DTDs and whatnot) of the
specification ;) but if at least an overview of required changes was
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2001 21:55:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2001 22:03:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 123771 ftp.debian.org
Bug#123771: update-excuses info from package pages
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:12:04PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: packages.debian.org
> Version: 2001-12-13
> Severity: wishlist
>
> The web form at packages.debian.org could let the user to look for
> packages in the experimental distribution as well.
That can be done... though not for c
Your message dated Sat, 15 Dec 2001 22:06:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 10:11:00PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Since `experimental' was "poolized" some time ago, I suppose this
> > should not be very difficult to implement.
> >
> > Moreover, since there is not going to be a `frozen' distribution,
> > `experimental' is the tree where people wi
16 matches
Mail list logo
