On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 12:39:45AM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> > Now we need a CVS repository for that. I thought of webwml,
>
> Does lack of answer on that mean "OK, do what you think is
> necessary" or "this idea sucks"?
Usually it means that nobody is interested enough to reply :)
If you a
Hi,
Just wanted to let you all know that the problem with debian-bsd not
appearing at http://lists.debian.org/ has been fixed. Old messages have been
`imported' into the web pages, too, along with any new ones of course.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 02:02:04AM +0900, Keita Maehara wrote:
> > "Debian GNU/Linux User Documentation" page in Japanese
> > has some broken links. (http://www.debian.org/doc/index.ja.html)
> >
> > broken links are:
> > http://metalab.unc.edu/mdw/HOWTO/Hardware-HOWTO.html
> > http://www.debian.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 85347 bugs.debian.org
Bug#85347: page for package "installation" not found
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `bugs.debian.org'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 84172 32214
Bug#32214: stale changelog links
Bug#84172: www.debian.org: changelog/copyright/... links on packages.debian.org
don't work
Bug#38922: changelog via web
Bug#39452: No changelog
Bug#56947: can't view package changelogs
Bug#63324: chang
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 20:55:39 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FAQ-O-Matic has been removed.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 20:54:49 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#80971: www.debian.org: /mirror/ needs updating
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 20:58:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#82497: /doc/ has some broken links
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 85822 bugs.debian.org
Bug#85822: www.debian.org: Timestamp page in BTS.
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `bugs.debian.org'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator,
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:15:46 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line changelogs, copyrights and lists of files no longer available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 17590 86082
Bug#17590: search contents of source packages
Bug#86082: Searching in source contents
Merged 17590 86082.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 82852 normal
Bug#82852: www.debian.org: Some automatic indexes not being properly generated
in Spanish translations
Severity set to `normal'.
> retitle 82852 DWN index for each year needs to depend on all the issues for
> that year
Bug#82852
Your message dated Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:28:01 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#79186: www.debian.org: bug-report page (Norwegian) has
wrong action url
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Version:
Synopsis: Disappearing packages
Class:sw-bug
Distribution: Debian 2.2
System: Linux 2.2.18pre21 i586 unknown
Description:
The gnu-smalltalk package seems to be getting lost. Perhaps others are
affected as well.
A couple of weeks ago there
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 04:45:51PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
>
> Description:
> The gnu-smalltalk package seems to be getting lost. Perhaps others are
> affected as well.
>
> A couple of weeks ago there were gnu-smalltalk packages in potato,
> woody, and unstable. Now
The reason I think this is a a web (or archive) issue is that there
were packages in stable and testing, and now there aren't. I assume
the gnu-smalltalk maintainer does not have direct control over the
archives, and also that nobody should be taking packages *out* of
stable.
By "Browse Unstable"
OK, scratch one mystery. gnu-smalltalk is listed under interpreters,
which is a perfectly fine place for it.
However, the whereabouts of the stable and testing versions,
particularly the former, is still a mystery. FYI, here's something
from my system, referring to a version number of the packag
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 86806 gnu-smalltalk
Bug#86806: Disappearing packages
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `gnu-smalltalk'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 86540 www.debian.org
Bug#86540: Organisational strukture broken
Bug reassigned from package `web' to `www.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
27 matches
Mail list logo
