Hello Subin
El 13/1/25 a las 13:44, Subin Siby escribió:
Hi,
Just wanted to notify here that https://packages.debian.org is showing
"Service Unavailable". I searched for "packages.debian.org" in
https://lists.debian.org/search.html but couldn't find a message
indicating planned maintenance o
Hi,
Just wanted to notify here that https://packages.debian.org is showing
"Service Unavailable". I searched for "packages.debian.org" in
https://lists.debian.org/search.html but couldn't find a message
indicating planned maintenance or a report that it's down now. Hence
reporting it here.
Your message dated Thu, 18 Nov 2021 09:45:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#999862: sso.debian.org: SSO no longer seems to work
has caused the Debian Bug report #999862,
regarding sso.debian.org: SSO no longer seems to work
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Wed, 2021-11-17 at 20:55 +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> So it would seem that sso.debian.org may no longer be functional,
> which prevents me from logging into tracker.debian.org.
My current certificate still works on tracker.d.o and the sso test URL.
I created a new cert and imported it into
Package: sso.debian.org
Severity: serious
I'm trying to log in to tracker.debian.org. I've manually created a
fresh certificate and loaded it into both Firefox (94.0-1) and Chrome
(from Google), I visit tracker.debian.org but it does not recognise it
at all. I also tried curl, as described on th
t;
> Date: 2020년 3월 15일 (일) 오후 7:55
> Subject: Re: webwml | Remove Search Link. It seems redundant. (6b1e1b84)
> To: Debian Webmaster Team / webwml
> <mailto:gitlab%2bf2feaad1cbacd2951588bd09da7f7...@salsa.debian.org>>
>
>
> Hello.
> Bottom of https://www.debian.
-- Forwarded message -
보낸사람: sebul
Date: 2020년 3월 15일 (일) 오후 7:55
Subject: Re: webwml | Remove Search Link. It seems redundant. (6b1e1b84)
To: Debian Webmaster Team / webwml <
gitlab+f2feaad1cbacd2951588bd09da7f7...@salsa.debian.org>
Hello.
Bottom of https://www.debi
在 2018年7月8日星期日 CST 上午12:30:00，Ulrike Uhlig 写道：
> Hi!
>
> A bug has been reported on tails-installer saying that
> packages.debian.org seems to relate to an executable of tails-installer:
>
> It shows tails-installer-launcher instead of tails-installer (this was
> m
Hi!
A bug has been reported on tails-installer saying that
packages.debian.org seems to relate to an executable of tails-installer:
It shows tails-installer-launcher instead of tails-installer (this was
modified 6+ months ago).
$ w3m -dump
https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/tails-installer
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Jonathan Femideer wrote:
> According to
> https://blog.torproject.org/debian-and-tor-services-available-onion-services
> , security.debian.org should be available via a hidden service at
> http://sgvtcaew4bxjd7ln.onion .
>
> That onion address times out for me, ev
According to
https://blog.torproject.org/debian-and-tor-services-available-onion-services
, security.debian.org should be available via a hidden service at
http://sgvtcaew4bxjd7ln.onion .
That onion address times out for me, even though security.debian.org is
accessible.
For anyone who reli
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:13 PM, rrbuer...@freenet.de wrote:
> seems, the debian project is totally undermined with saboteurs in those
> days: saw such a lot of "errors" never before and never in all other
> releases than in stretch! the debian-mirrors are a nightmare now
&g
seems, the debian project is totally undermined with saboteurs in those
days: saw such a lot of "errors" never before and never in all other
releases than in stretch! the debian-mirrors are a nightmare now
anyhow!
should be investigated alls - and WILL be investigated for sure
that
Your message dated Sun, 03 Jul 2011 21:10:51 -0400
with message-id <4e11131b.4090...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#630181: www.debian.org: anonymous cvs pserver URI
seems be changed
has caused the Debian Bug report #630181,
regarding www.debian.org: anonymous cvs pserver URI se
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 630181 ad...@alioth.debian.org
Bug #630181 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: anonymous cvs pserver URI seems be
changed
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'ad...@alioth.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
forwarded 630181 ad...@alioth.debian.org
thanks
Le 11/06/2011 19:18, Kenshi Muto a écrit :
> I noticed last Alioth transition changed CVS pserver URI.
Indeed, we've already asked a few times for a solution for the broken
URL, it's part of the “Kno
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
I noticed last Alioth transition changed CVS pserver URI.
http://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs.en.html said:
cvs -d :pserver:anonym...@cvs.alioth.debian.org:/cvsroot/webwml login
But it went:
Your message dated Sun, 2 Sep 2007 20:59:08 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 02:54:59PM +0200, k_f wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: important
>
> Aptitude shows: Couldn't fetch URL
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/...
> If i Try to use my Webbrowser to get the changelog it shows a 404
> Error, the http directory listing shows near
if i use my Webbrowser i get:
>
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/apt/
From a bit further investigation (and take this with a grain of salt, I
don't know the extract script): The extraction seems to go through the
directory structure alphabetically and has stopped at
Last modified Size Description
[DIR] Parent Directory09-Jul-2007 11:34 -
[ ] current-
Apache/1.3.33 Server at packages.debian.org Port 80
===
it seems not to contain any Changelog
So long,
K
Am Sonntag, den 22.07.2007, 14:54 +0200 schrieb k_f:
> Aptitude shows: Couldn't fetch URL
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/...
> If i Try to use my Webbrowser to get the changelog it shows a 404
> Error, the http directory listing shows nearly empty directory
> only containing a current whic
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
Aptitude shows: Couldn't fetch URL
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/...
If i Try to use my Webbrowser to get the changelog it shows a 404
Error, the http directory listing shows nearly empty directory
only containing a current which also leads to a
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:21:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298759: www.debian.org: "Why Debian" page contains
paragraph that seems dated
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi Silas!
You wrote:
> The page http://www.debian.org/intro/why_debian contains a
> paragraph labelled "Good system security" which begins
> "Windows 95 has essentially no security." True, but
> mentioning Windows 95 first makes it seem rather dated
> (someone may conclude that the arguments are
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:14:16PM -, peter green wrote:
> for example
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=gaim
> is still showing testing as having 1:2.0.0+beta4-3 and unstable as having
> 1:2.0.0+beta3-4. According to the "lat
for example
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?searchon=names&version=all&exact=1&keywords=gaim
is still showing testing as having 1:2.0.0+beta4-3 and unstable as having
1:2.0.0+beta3-4. According to the "latest news" section on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gaim.html this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/27/2006 11:04 AM, Florian Ludwig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it looks okay to me cause the second sentence "NT and XP have shown
> themselves to be very bad also". Although if we mention windows 95 we
> should also mention 98 instead of skipping it.
>
> O
Hi,
it looks okay to me cause the second sentence "NT and XP have shown
themselves to be very bad also". Although if we mention windows 95 we
should also mention 98 instead of skipping it.
Otherwise i would mark this bug as "will not fixed" if nobody disagree.
greetings,
Florian Ludwig
--
To
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 11:58:15AM +0100, Roger Oshaug wrote:
> I am trying to get a newer version than 0.24 of java-package, but it
> seems I cant get to it on your web-site. There is no response from
> packages.debian.org when searching.
I'm not able to contact it either. In
Hi,
I am trying to get a newer version than 0.24 of java-package, but it
seems I cant get to it on your web-site. There is no response from
packages.debian.org when searching.
Regards,
Roger Oshaug, Norway
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: debian-faq seems outdated
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-PGP
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 05:45:57PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 04:44:33PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> I believe that a build needs to be forced in www-master, but I don't have
> access to klecker, as it's restricted. CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> so that t
e is none...
No, that was an error I introduced _after_ the build error and it's part
of the addition of the Spanish translation to the DDP CVS. I've fixed that
now so it should build now fine.
> It seems
> /cvs/debian-doc/ddp/manuals.sgml/faq/es/Attic/debian-faq-es.sgml (as
> shown on
&
gt; > package ships "version 3.1.2, 9 June 2005". Is the debian-faq on the
> > > web really as outdated as it seems? If so, it'd be nice if someone
> > > could make sure it got updated. If not, it'd be cool if someone could
> > > fix the misleadin
ys: "version CVS, 14 February 2003". However, the current doc-debian
> > package ships "version 3.1.2, 9 June 2005". Is the debian-faq on the
> > web really as outdated as it seems? If so, it'd be nice if someone
> > could make sure it got updated. If
n the
> > web really as outdated as it seems? If so, it'd be nice if someone
> > could make sure it got updated. If not, it'd be cool if someone could
> > fix the misleading version string.
>
> For some reason bot the english and all the translations are stalled
> package ships "version 3.1.2, 9 June 2005". Is the debian-faq on the
> web really as outdated as it seems? If so, it'd be nice if someone
> could make sure it got updated. If not, it'd be cool if someone could
> fix the misleading version string.
For some reas
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
The page on http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/index.en.html
says: "version CVS, 14 February 2003". However, the current doc-debian
package ships "version 3.1.2, 9 June 2005". Is the debian-faq on the
web really as
org
Subject: Bug#298759: www.debian.org: "Why Debian" page contains paragraph that
seems dated
Reply-To: "Silas S. Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 298759
X-Debian-PR-Package: www.debian.org
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
From: "Sil
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2005-03-09
Severity: normal
The page http://www.debian.org/intro/why_debian contains a
paragraph labelled "Good system security" which begins
"Windows 95 has essentially no security." True, but
mentioning Windows 95 first makes it seem rather dated
(
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>
>Hi Everybody!
>
>Since yesterday evening (CET) I'm trying to get this file:
>http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
>
>Insteadt of the desired file, I get a annoying 'TIME OUT'.
>
>Is there any mirror? I
local system buggy? Or can somebody just reboot the
> server?
There was something wrong with the server, but it seems to work now.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Everybody!
Since yesterday evening (CET) I'm trying to get this file:
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Insteadt of the desired file, I get a annoying 'TIME OUT'.
Is there any mirror? Is my local system buggy? Or can somebody just reboot
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 08:42:04PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:38:09PM -0200, Cesar Eduardo Barros wrote:
> > http://svn.debian.org/ should allow access via ViewCVS to the
> > repositories. However (taking the 'kernel' repository as an example):
> >
> > http://svn.debian.
Your message dated Tue, 7 Dec 2004 20:42:04 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#284682: svn.debian.org seems to be a bit misconfigured
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
http://svn.debian.org/ should allow access via ViewCVS to the
repositories. However (taking the 'kernel' repository as an example):
http://svn.debian.org/viewcvs/kernel is a 404
http://svn.debian.org/svn/kernel/ shows the internal structure of the
reposito
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:00:20AM -0700, Isaac Gouy wrote:
> http://alioth.debian.org/ doesn't seem to be responding
Hmm... no web
But I get ping and I can login with ssh.
I see:
www-data 3549 0.0 0.2 88560 2028 ?SJul25 0:24 /usr/sbin/apache
etc. Strange.
Osamu
Howdy,
I hope y'all are still the admins for alioth. Anyway, would you
please look into the following problem:
- Forwarded message from Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Isaac Gouy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Alioth: Debian GForge alioth.debian.org seems to ha
http://alioth.debian.org/ doesn't seem to be responding
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
On http://lists.debian.org/search.html I type "alsa" (without the
quotes) in the "Search for" box.
Select "user" in "list filter".
Select Jan-Mar 04 in "Date filter".
Hit search.
As far as I can tell, my post
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/debi
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:13:33PM +0200, Christian Ohm wrote:
> hi.
>
> in the current version of icewm in unstable, this behaviour was restored.
Just for the record: You meant bug 178841 [1], not 178831 [2], don't you?
;)
Frank
[1] #178841 icewm: fullscreen windows one pixel to the left
[2] #
hi.
in the current version of icewm in unstable, this behaviour was restored.
thanks,
christian ohm
--
Mathematicians do it in theory.
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 08:34:14PM +0200, Tommi Vainikainen wrote:
> For example http://www.de.debian.org/devel/website/stats/> says
> "last update Dec 4".
I just checked the mirror log file... Eek!
Signalling debian.hands.com
Signalling ftp.it.net.au
setgid 1176: Operation not permitted
setgid 1
For example http://www.de.debian.org/devel/website/stats/> says
"last update Dec 4".
--
Tommi Vainikainen
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 01:34:01PM -0600, Matt Kraai wrote:
[...]
> The following patch changes it so that this will work. It won't
> note that the German page is outdated if the English page falls
> behind the Romanian, but this seems to parallel the translation-
> check behavi
y isn't true. It's just 1.6. The diff also points to the
> chinese/international/Chinese/index page.
>
> This seems to happen for pages that don't have an english orgiginal.
> Although that might be useful for some people it's blatantly wrong. The
> translati
he
chinese/international/Chinese/index page.
This seems to happen for pages that don't have an english orgiginal.
Although that might be useful for some people it's blatantly wrong. The
translation-check in the german version doesn't refer to the chinese
english version - and there
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:26:57AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:21:13AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > > while looking for distrib/vendors, i found that
> > > http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendors.fr.html
> > > is broken, and it seems d
On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 01:21:13AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > while looking for distrib/vendors, i found that
> > http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendors.fr.html
> > is broken, and it seems due to wml::debian::translation-check
> > Patch attached.
>
> Hmm
Denis Barbier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:36:56AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> > Hi,
> > while looking for distrib/vendors, i found that
> > http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendors.fr.html
> > is broken, and it seems due to wml::debian::translation-check
&g
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 01:36:56AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> Hi,
> while looking for distrib/vendors, i found that
> http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendors.fr.html
> is broken, and it seems due to wml::debian::translation-check
> Patch attached.
Hmmm, looks like i need some
Hi,
while looking for distrib/vendors, i found that
http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendors.fr.html
is broken, and it seems due to wml::debian::translation-check
Patch attached.
Denis
Index: translation-check.wml
===
RCS file: /cvs
I'm sure these two problems are related and will be bring it up with
the wml author when he gets back from vacation.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
~~~~
The underlined sequence apparently makes mp4h die, it seems to interpret the
Latin2 letter ê (that's `e' with a cedilla, or what's the name) as <, i.e.
the start of a tag.
The second case:
make[4]: Entering directory
`/debian2/web/webwml/japanese/SPI/cor
65 matches
Mail list logo
