Your message dated Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:36:02 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FAQ has been built fine
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Sep 2005 14:44:35 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 14 07:44:35 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gelfand.mdcc.cx (stegun.mdcc.cx) [80.126.189.155]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFYV1-0001LY-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:44:35 -0700
Received: from nagy.mdcc.cx (nagy.mdcc.cx
[IPv6:2001:888:1a9b:0:204:e2ff:fe33:5ea5])
by stegun.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3937285
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:44:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by nagy.mdcc.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D1C88296FAE; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:44:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:44:33 +0200
From: Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: debian-faq seems outdated
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 8FC6 A40E 31B8 7E0E 2270 D7A9 0606 9CF2 9694 57F0
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x969457F0
X-PGP-Key: http://mdcc.cx/~joostvb/joostvb_key.asc
X-Accept-Language: nl, en
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
The page on http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/index.en.html
says: "version CVS, 14 February 2003". However, the current doc-debian
package ships "version 3.1.2, 9 June 2005". Is the debian-faq on the
web really as outdated as it seems? If so, it'd be nice if someone
could make sure it got updated. If not, it'd be cool if someone could
fix the misleading version string.
Thanks, Bye,
Joost
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDKDdRBgac8paUV/ARArPcAJ96qkOJmTH3ueEqzuUm/rY1vZZowACglUXK
bk62jc3yacTnx5mQFkC/YH8=
=lwgu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--DocE+STaALJfprDB--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 328275-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 08:36:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 15 01:36:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 148.red-213-96-98.pooles.rima-tde.net (javifsp.no-ip.org)
[213.96.98.148] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFpDx-0007re-00; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 01:36:05 -0700
Received: from jfs by javifsp.no-ip.org with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1EFpDv-0004d5-0J
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:36:03 +0200
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 10:36:02 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FAQ has been built fine
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The Debian FAQ has now been built and uploaded to www.debian.org and=20
is updated to the latests CVS sources so I'm closing this bug.
Regards
Javier
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDKTJysandgtyBSwkRAjZBAJ0YQa6z78HUU1f2dGP7vrF79sT94gCfSBXw
5IzPgo1ksN4I4VwvJgTp5/8=
=5I1L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
