Re: Web Pages

* John Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-13 12:44]: > No offense guys but you really do need to make your web pages look a > little more professional. No offense boy but you really do need to be more verbose to sound a little more professional. So long, Alfie -- Debian trennt strikt zwischen

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

* doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-14 12:41]: > Alfie, thanks for reviewing the CVS logs, it's nice to know that someone > is watching for mistakes that I might make. TBH I didn't directly review the CVS logs, it was just that the files were already translated and I noticed it through upd

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

Matt, I've finally gotten around to doing a diff on the patches you committed for the 1999 directory. Thanks for making the spelling corrections. I'm still having problems with spaces in the content, around the tags, hopefully next time will be better. Thanks for your help. Peter and Alfie, tha

Re: Web Pages

Hi Mike! You wrote: > I don't know how content and presentation are > separated in Debian's web site backend Conent and presentation are quite well separated. The webpages are built using wml, which basically expands macros and adds headers, footers, etc. In principe, it should only be necess

Re: Web Pages

On Sunday 14 September 2003 10:15, Martin Quinson wrote: > Sure. But what are you proposing, precisly ? I guess you know that Debian > is not made by professional, but by enthousiatics, don't you? I would be > pleased to work on the accessibility of the web page, but that list of > keywords does no

Re: Web Pages

On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 08:00:03PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Saturday 13 September 2003 19:51, Robin Y. Millette wrote: > > John Savage wrote: > > | No offense guys but you really do need to make your web pages look a > > | little more professional. > > > > You mean like adding flash and stuff

Re: Web Pages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Hommey wrote: | On Saturday 13 September 2003 19:51, Robin Y. Millette wrote: | |>John Savage wrote: |>| No offense guys but you really do need to make your web pages look a |>| little more professional. |> |>You mean like adding flash and stuff

Re: Web Pages

On Saturday 13 September 2003 19:51, Robin Y. Millette wrote: > John Savage wrote: > | No offense guys but you really do need to make your web pages look a > | little more professional. > > You mean like adding flash and stuff? I rather have a site that's > available in a bunch of languages then an

Re: Web Pages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Savage wrote: | | | No offense guys but you really do need to make your web pages look a | little more professional. | You mean like adding flash and stuff? I rather have a site that's available in a bunch of languages then any fluff you can cra

Re: Fixed patch was Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 03:48:50PM -0600, doug jensen wrote: > Should I ask, "Please find errors in these patches." instead of "If this > is ok could someone please commit?" > > Fixed patches? Attached. Applied, thanks. -- Matt

Fixed patch was Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:10:40AM -0600, doug jensen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:27:49PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > * Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:10]: > > > but it is a lot more work to figure out what word was changed in a > > > re-justified paragraph. > > > >

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:27:49PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:10]: > > but it is a lot more work to figure out what word was changed in a > > re-justified paragraph. > > I don't think that we can't overemphasis on this. Don't do it... > So

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

* Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:10]: > Yes, the result may look prettier Only in the source, the resulting webpage doesn't look anymore fancier than without readjusting > but it is a lot more work to figure out what word was changed in a > re-justified paragraph. I don'

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

doug jensen: > If this set of patches are ok, could someone please commit them? Please avoid doing formatting changes to the source when also changing content, it makes it a lot harder to find the content changes for us translators. Especially avoid to re-justify paragraphs. Yes, the result may l

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 04:22:39AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > I've committed them (modulo a bunch of typo fixes). Thanks. > Matt, thanks for making all those corrections and committing the patches for the undated directory. This next set of patches are for the webwml/english/security/1999 di

Re: Take this off the list, please {Was: Re: Web pages/Debian/languages: Great!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > all the rest of the garbage you (and/or Peter) spewed thus becomes > your responsibility for not reading it. If you did not want this discussed on the list, you should not have sent it to it. I responded to the list since I read it on the list, and kept the discussion there,

Take this off the list, please {Was: Re: Web pages/Debian/languages: Great!

discussion. In a message dated 2003/08/28 11:25:16 Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Subj: Re: Web pages/Debian/languages: Great! Date: 2003/08/28 11:25:16 Eastern Daylight Time From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: debian-www@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL

Re: Web pages/Debian/languages: Great!

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-08-28 10:11]: > I have taken this off the mailing list. Please note both Peter and > Alfie left it on list, in violation of the newbies FAQ. Uhm? Sorry, I haven't scanned your other mail yet (I will respond to it when I find the time for it, am a little bit stressed a

Re: Web pages/Debian/languages: Great!

this very topic. In a message dated 2003/08/28 04:15:17 Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Subj: Re: Web pages/Debian/languages: Great! Date: 2003/08/28 04:15:17 Eastern Daylight Time From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: debian-www@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL

Re: Web pages/Debian/languages: Great!

Hi! Uhm, is the huge Cc: list needed? Maybe people interested can track the thread through archive, I'm not a fan of huge Cc lists. I've stripped Peter from the Cc list because I know that he is reading the list -- after all he answered to your mail

Re: Web pages/Debian/languages: Great!

: Web pages/Debian/languages: Great! Date: 2003/08/27 08:59:21 Eastern Daylight Time From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: debian-www@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent from the Internet [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >I) It might be better

Re: Web pages/Debian/languages: Great!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I) It might be better to have language references at the TOP of the > structure instead of the bottom. That would take up too much room at the top of the page, which would require you to scroll down to read every single page. I doubt that would be a good idea. > II) A stand

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:57:38PM -0600, doug jensen wrote: > Attached are patches for the 'undated' security advisories. After they > are applied there will be four _unpatched_ advisories in that directory, > three for 'xfree' and one for 'mc'. At this time it doesn't appear > that I will find

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

Hello, Attached are patches for the 'undated' security advisories. After they are applied there will be four _unpatched_ advisories in that directory, three for 'xfree' and one for 'mc'. At this time it doesn't appear that I will find any useable information for those four advisories. If all th

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:38:19AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > ## This change allows "Vulnerable" to be "Yes" and "Security database > > ## reference" to be displayed. > > --- security/undated/1ssh.data.old Thu Apr 19 09:52:11 2001 > > +++ security/undated/1ssh.data.new Sat Jul 19 17:37:41 200

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:03:43AM -0600, doug jensen wrote: > > -Yes > > +yes > ... > > Why do you change the case of "yes"? > > I'm guessing that the isvulnerable tag is case sensitive. Changing the > case causes the "yes" to be displayed on the web page. It looks like most of the undated advi

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:38:19AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > I've applied the changes for buzz, but I couldn't find any uses > for rex. Could you point me to one? You are correct, there is nothing using the rex code at this time. The code seemed more complete with it included, but it will pro

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 05:24:02PM -0600, doug jensen wrote: > An email sent to debian-security, asking for comments from Matt and/or > Javier, received no response. > > So, I'm wondering if anyone wants to commit the following three patches? > Thanks for your consideration. Thanks for cleaning t

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:15:14AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-20 18:53]: > > So, I will make those corrections and send the patches back to the list > > to be commited, or bug reports to www.debian.org, or ...? > > Send them to the list, IMHO no need

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

* doug jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-20 18:53]: > So, I will make those corrections and send the patches back to the list > to be commited, or bug reports to www.debian.org, or ...? Send them to the list, IMHO no need to bloat the BTS with it. If noone reacts you can still send them to the

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 11:43:49PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > What about the debian-security-announce list archive? I intend to work on those also. > Looks okay... but I'd move the note about potential problems below the list, > and remove the last three items -- visitors don't really care much

Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security

On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 02:16:19PM -0600, doug jensen wrote: > Find the "moreinfo" entries for older years that contain mentions > of lists-archives instead of including text from it or even linking > to it, and correct it. > > There are many advisories in 1997 and early 1998 that lack eve

Re: Web Pages

> > rsync with a -n (or --dry-run) option will tell you which files it would > > copy, delete etc. without actually touching anything. > > > This was done last night and found one other bad file in the Bug lists. > Since rsync doesn't check file contents, just sizes, it won't catch any bit > error

Re: Web Pages

I don't know why you have trouble with rsync. Mirror is the program that has caused most everyone else trouble. On most days, rsync takes less than 10 minutes to update the web site. > But: Why has the mailing-list to be mirrored? > Check out http://va.debian.org/~treacy and you will see that the

Re: Web Pages

> rsync with a -n (or --dry-run) option will tell you which files it would > copy, delete etc. without actually touching anything. > This was done last night and found one other bad file in the Bug lists. Since rsync doesn't check file contents, just sizes, it won't catch any bit errors as occurre

Re: Web Pages

Hi! > rsync with a -n (or --dry-run) option will tell you which files it would > copy, delete etc. without actually touching anything. > > Here's a command line that would do the trick for my machine: > > rsync --dry-run -rlpt --delete --exclude sponsor.html -e ssh \ >va.debian.org:/usr/d

Re: Web Pages

> > Is there any way to verify the web pages? Perhaps compare their md5 sum's > with the mirror on va? > > Master's hard disk was giving read errors which linux ignored and thus > probably silently messed up lots of stuff. at least 4 files in the ftp > archive have been hosed. > > Anything on /d