Gerfried Fuchs:
> Uhm, I am not sure if I understand your correction correctly: Can
> someone please proofread if the correction is in fact correct?
Well, in the original version it states that keeping meta-gnome2 is
what is required to have proper GNOME in Sarge. As far as I could tell,
it is h
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 04:10:33PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> * Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-08 13:08]:
> > Log message:
> > Rephrased paragraph about meta-gnome2, keeping it out hinders proper
> > GNOME,
> > not the other way around.
>
> Uhm, I am not sure if I unders
* Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-08 13:08]:
> Modified files:
> english/News/weekly/2004/01: index.wml
>
> Log message:
> Rephrased paragraph about meta-gnome2, keeping it out hinders proper
> GNOME,
> not the other way around.
Uhm, I am not sure if I understand
3 matches
Mail list logo