On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 04:10:33PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Debian WWW CVS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-08 13:08]: > > Log message: > > Rephrased paragraph about meta-gnome2, keeping it out hinders proper > > GNOME, > > not the other way around. > > Uhm, I am not sure if I understand your correction correctly: Can > someone please proofread if the correction is in fact correct? > > #v+ > <code>meta-gnome2</code> packages. He listed 13 packages that bear one or > more problems. Each of them is a reason to keep <code>meta-gnome2</code> out > -of the testing distribution, which is required for proper GNOME in sarge. > +of the testing distribution, which stops proper GNOME in sarge. > #v- > > From my understanding the old version was more clear. meta-gnome2 is > required for proper GNOME in sarge. > > Oh, I see your misunderstanding: You think the "which" corresponds to > the keeping out of meta-gnome2, not meta-gnome2 itself. But your change > doesn't really clear what the which corresponds to. > > Can someone please suggest a rephrase to make it clear?
"Each of them is a reason to keep <code>meta-gnome2</code> out of the testing distribution. That package is required in order to have a properly working GNOME in sarge." (Also, you don't really "bear" problems, you simply "have" them.) -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
