Hi Borden,
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 21:12:06 +0200 (CEST), Borden
> said:
> A lot of it should be removed since it will just frustrate new users and
lead to more traffic on -users as people ask why a squeeze (or earlier)
tutorial doesn't work on their system.
I'm also a friend of r
[sorry for the long mail, lots of thoughts below]
Dan Coleman wrote:
> One thing, you will need your email whitelisted by someone on this
> list (I don't know who has that authority, but I've seen quick
> turnarounds on requests) before you can make an account.
I set Borden's email address to ap
19 Aug 2022, 15:58 by autop...@protonmail.com:
> Hi Borden,
>
> I think that updating or removing obsolete information is a great idea, I've
> noticed the same issue of badly outdated info on the wiki.
>
> Personally, I don't believe you'll step on too many toes by updating
> information, but de
Hi Borden,
I think that updating or removing obsolete information is a great idea, I've
noticed the same issue of badly outdated info on the wiki.
Personally, I don't believe you'll step on too many toes by updating
information, but deleting is another matter. Maybe prominently flagging
inform
This is a follow-up to
https://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/2021/09/msg00018.html, in which Popescu
referred a question about obsolete wiki content to the -www mailing list
(which I personally don't think is quite right because the wiki is supposed to
be documentation).
Agreeing with Kesper
(
5 matches
Mail list logo
