Hi
I have added the pending sections to the index.wml file, and committed
to the branch.
I'm attaching the file in its current state, too.
It still needs work, in particular, add some paragraph at the end
linking to the old folders/files, for example for people looking for
non stable releases, or
Hi
El 17/07/16 a las 18:03, Steve McIntyre escribió:
> Hey Laura,
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:14:59PM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>> El 31/03/16 a las 19:09, Steve McIntyre escribió:
>
> ...
>
>>>
>>> * Replace that link with a link to a simple "Download" page which
>>>gives *simpl
Hey Laura,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:14:59PM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
>El 31/03/16 a las 19:09, Steve McIntyre escribió:
...
>>
>> * Replace that link with a link to a simple "Download" page which
>>gives *simple* instructions and links. This would be similar to
>>what we have
El 01/04/16 a las 06:33, Paul Wise escribió:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Thoughts?
An overhaul of the getting Debian pages is indeed long overdue.
Adrian Gibanel had some great ideas about presentation of derivatives
stuff on the website, perhaps he has some about r
On 4/1/2016 4:51 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
[snip]
Probably the FAQ could be eliminated by addressing most of the entries
in the text?
Yes, I think so, but in subsidiary pages. I'd like to keep the *first*
download page as simple as possible, with the "more..." links for any
more details that
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 12:33:49PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> Thoughts?
>
>An overhaul of the getting Debian pages is indeed long overdue.
>
>Adrian Gibanel had some great ideas about presentation of derivatives
>stuff on the website, perhaps
Hi,
is it considered a bug that
http://get.debian.net/
only works with Javascript enabled ?
(If not a security risk, it is at least an annoyance to browse
the general web with Javascript. All that blinking, popping, and
driving up of CPU speed ...)
Have a nice day :)
Thomas
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Thoughts?
An overhaul of the getting Debian pages is indeed long overdue.
Adrian Gibanel had some great ideas about presentation of derivatives
stuff on the website, perhaps he has some about reorganising the
'getting Debian' section of the
Hi,
some texts which should be considered:
> * Verify your download
https://www.debian.org/CD/verify
https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#verify
> * How to write to USB
https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#write-usb
> * How to write to optical media
https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#record-unix
https://ww
El 31/03/16 a las 19:09, Steve McIntyre escribió:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: important
>
>
> * Replace that link with a link to a simple "Download" page which
>gives *simple* instructions and links. This would be similar to
>what we have at https://www.debian.org/distrib/ , bu
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
As pointed out in
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/201603301121.25333.lisi.re...@gmail.com
, we may be giving links to download ISO images but we're not giving
*any* useful information about the checksums and signatures for those
images in pages
11 matches
Mail list logo
