* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 23:58]:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail
>
> Yeah, it's kind of a bug and I also know his cause. The scripts currently
> use always the information applying
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 237171 confirmed
Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"
Tags were: sid
Tags added: confirmed
> retitle 237171 packages.debian.org: pages should sometimes use the newest
> information
Bug#237171:
tags 237171 confirmed
retitle 237171 packages.debian.org: pages should sometimes use the newest
information
thanks
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Dominique Devriese wrote:
>
> package kmail
> reassign 237171 www.debian.org
> thanks
>
> Guillaume Pratte writes:
>
> > Package: kmail V
Gerfried Fuchs writes:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail
>>
>>> I'm not sure whether this bug is valid or not, but it's surely not
>>> a kdenetwork bug.
>>
>> notice that the "KDE network module" text on that page is grabbed
>> from kmail package description.
> And? What has th
* Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-10 19:01]:
> reassign 237171 kmail
> severity 237171 minor
> thanks
Thanks, Riku, but no. Don't play ping pong with bugs if you are not
sure whats going on.
>>> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail
>
>> I'm not sure whether this bug is valid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 237171 www.debian.org
Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"
Bug reassigned from package `kmail' to `www.debian.org'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 237171 kmail
Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `kmail'.
> severity 237171 minor
Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reporte
reassign 237171 kmail
severity 237171 minor
thanks
> > On packages.debian.org, kmail' sources are incorrectly reported as
> > "kdenetwork" (should be kdepim).
> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail
> I'm not sure whether this bug is valid or not, but it's surely not a
> kdenetwork
Riku Voipio writes:
> reassign 237171 kmail severity 237171 minor thanks
>> > On packages.debian.org, kmail' sources are incorrectly reported
>> > as "kdenetwork" (should be kdepim).
>> > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail
>> I'm not sure whether this bug is valid or not, but it's
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package kmail
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: kmail
> reassign 237171 www.debian.org
Bug#237171: kmail 3.2.1 sources incorrectly reported as "kdenetwork"
Bug reassigned from package `kmail' to `www.debian.org'.
> th
package kmail
reassign 237171 www.debian.org
thanks
Guillaume Pratte writes:
> Package: kmail Version: 4:3.1.5-1 Severity: normal Tags: sid
> On packages.debian.org, kmail' sources are incorrectly reported as
> "kdenetwork" (should be kdepim).
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/mail/kmail
11 matches
Mail list logo