On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:21:17PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Please would you regenerate the following files from the (corrent)
> > EPS or PDF files, thus helping banish the old, broken logo from
> > the face of the earth?
>
> Can you provide us with exact instructions on how to fix this?
>
>
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 11:59:26PM +, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
> In the "Load Postscript" dialog, set "resolution" to 831.
>
> With a resolution of 831 DPI, this should give an image of very nearly the
> same pixel dimensions as the current openlogo-nd.xcf.gz. Right-click in
> the image,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 02:24:43AM +, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
> The XFig versions of the official logo are hideous -- even worse than the
> XFig versions of the open logo. On officiallogo.fig, the holes in the
> "d", "e", "b" and "a" of "debian" have filled in with black.
So that isn't a
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:44:46PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Note also that there are other files that have this bad version:
> openlogo-nd.xcf.gz
> officiallogo.xcf.gz
> And probably their .fig variants (didn't check).
>
> The swirl on officiallogo-nd.xcf.gz looks uglier than the one on
> o
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:21:17PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 06:56:11PM +, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
> > Please would you regenerate the following files from the (corrent) EPS or
> > PDF files, thus helping banish the old, broken logo from the face of the
> > earth?
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:21:17PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I have checked, and, while all the JPEG, PNG, EPS and PDF versions of
> > the [Debian] logo seem to be correct, the Gimp ".xcf" and XFig ".fig"
> > versions are incorrect.
>
> I noticed this before (a few years back or so), but didn'
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:21:17PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I have checked, and, while all the JPEG, PNG, EPS and PDF versions of
> > the logo seem to be correct, the Gimp ".xcf" and XFig ".fig" versions
> > are incorrect.
>
> I noticed this before (a few years back or so), but didn't know ho
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 06:56:11PM +, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
> I have checked, and, while all the JPEG, PNG, EPS and PDF versions of
> the logo seem to be correct, the Gimp ".xcf" and XFig ".fig" versions
> are incorrect.
I noticed this before (a few years back or so), but didn't know ho
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-20
Severity: normal
This page gives an account of an error which crept into the current
Debian logo when/since it was first adopted:
http://www.hands.com/~phil/debian/logo/readme.html
I noticed recently that the logo which gdm uses by defaul
9 matches
Mail list logo
