I think that you have missed the point. I don't believe that the
intention of the discussion was to size-off the merits of Open Source
and Free Software. Rather, my reading of the message was that it proposed
that different projects work together to offer greater protection
agai
On 2003-12-12 15:48:11 + Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When speaking about "facts" you know that Microsoft calls their
initiative "shared source", not "open source", do you?
I am sure you can find cases where that is not true. Not everyone
speaking of "open source" speaks of "
Hi!
Stripped off [EMAIL PROTECTED] off the list -- if it is an open
letter it shouldn't be hidden in a closed list.
* "Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-12-12 14:16]:
> I doubt that RMS is considering intentions, but is looking at facts.
>
> In current use, the term `open so
I think that you have missed the point. I don't believe that the
intention of the discussion was to size-off the merits of Open Source
and Free Software.
I doubt that RMS is considering intentions, but is looking at facts.
In current use, the term `open source' conflates at least two
di
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 09:45:58AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> An open letter to the open source community about the security of open
> source projects.
>
> Please don't think of the GNU system as an "open source project". GNU
> is a free software project, part of the free software
An open letter to the open source community about the security of open
source projects.
Please don't think of the GNU system as an "open source project". GNU
is a free software project, part of the free software movement. "Open
source" is the label of a philosophy that we disagree with.
An open letter to the open source community about the security of open
source projects.
With the recent attacks on open source projects I was stuck by and idea. I
thought that open source projects could come together and pool there
resources to form a project whose soul goal would be to protec
7 matches
Mail list logo
