Re: unoffical debian logos, banners and covers

2002-09-26 Thread Raul Miller
Le Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 04:21:19PM +0300, Volkan YAZICI ?crivait: > >> > there are currently 9 logos, 13 banners, 3 vertical banners, > >> > 5 cd covers, 2 workouts > >> > > >> > adress is http://www.linuks.mine.nu/volkany/ Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote: > >> They are really nice, I like them.

Bug#99439: Change in committee membership

2001-05-31 Thread Raul Miller
Package: www.debian.org Version: 2001-05-31 Severity: wishlist On http://www.debian.org/intro/organization Klee Dienes is no longer a committee member (he was removed a couple weeks ago). Jason Gunthorpe replaces him (he was officially confirmed, today). Thanks, -- Raul

Bug#94992: Wichert is now a committee member

2001-04-24 Thread Raul Miller
reassign 94992 lists.debian.org -- On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 12:41:18AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > (doesn't work anymore ;) Hm.. I suppose I should have piped the thing through tail. > Yeah but this isn't a www.debian.org issue, rather an aliases file issue, > or something? Er.. Reassigning to

Bug#94992: Wichert is now a committee member

2001-04-23 Thread Raul Miller
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:19:32PM -0500, James A. Treacy wrote: > [snip] > > This message is being sent to open a bug report. > > > Why? > If it so he is added to the Tech. Committee in intro/organization, you are > too late. You may have noticed that the web team was included in the original >

Bug#94992: Wichert is now a committee member

2001-04-23 Thread Raul Miller
Package: www.debian.org On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:05:20PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Raul Miller wrote: > > Wichert Akkerman is now a technical committee member. > > > > Please add him to the various lists for this (moderator and > > of course subscriber to th

Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution A.5

2000-10-11 Thread Raul Miller
Dienes > member Raul Miller I don't know where this came from. No one ever voted for Ian as committee chairman. Here's the votes: Dale Scheetzhttp://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte-9908/msg00102.html Ian Jackson http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte-9908/msg00057.html

Re: Raul's banners etc

2000-02-08 Thread Raul Miller
[Note: In this context, I'm not Raul.] On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 02:46:09PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: > I might not be in the popular thought here, but I would prefer to see > them Public Domain'd. The reason? If they are installed in a page that > isn't licensed the same, They would need attri

Re: no link to the y2k page?

1999-10-16 Thread Raul Miller
On Sat, Oct 16, 1999 at 08:57:43PM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > Are we talking about the same page? > > scooter$ lynx -source http://www.debian.org/y2k/index.html | grep -i option The subject is links to that page, not links from that page. I gotta run though (plane to catch). -- Raul

Re: no link to the y2k page?

1999-10-12 Thread Raul Miller
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 11:11:34AM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote: > Anyone care to spend a little time looking into some reorganization? > We need to make sure that information is organized so that it is > easy to find. I've been playing around with it a bit -- not sure I'm going to come up with an

Configuring APT

1999-07-15 Thread Raul Miller
We need a reference list of aptable archive references on the web site. I know that some of the information on this list would duplicate the ftp mirrors list, but only some of it. I was under the impression that someone (Jason?) had already done most of the work for creating such a thing. Does a

Re: unclear formulations in license_disc.wml

1998-10-14 Thread Raul Miller
Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oo...I like that even better.. 'cept there are too many their's Well, there's only one, but maybe it would be clearer with the word "that"? > "Anyone who releases software using the GPL does not consider these > restrictions bad, because it force

Re: unclear formulations in license_disc.wml

1998-10-14 Thread Raul Miller
--On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 1:41 pm +0200 "Philipp Frauenfelder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Anyone who releases software using the GPL does not consider > > these restrictions bad, because it prevents others from making > > money off of their hard work while allowing others to use it." > > > >