[Note: In this context, I'm not Raul.] On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 02:46:09PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: > I might not be in the popular thought here, but I would prefer to see > them Public Domain'd. The reason? If they are installed in a page that > isn't licensed the same, They would need attribution on every page (or > in the gif) of who owns the copyright... atleast technically.
Putting the copyright statement into the image as a comment might be a way to go. But traditionally such images have been protected by trademark rather than copyright. Perhaps we could get spi to trademark the things.. -- Raul
