Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?

2005-10-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
find out who did what. In that case... If you can get a legal opinion that the pages were created as works-for-hire, then SPI actually does hold the copyrights. Otherwise, you're stuck rewriting the webpages, if you want to be legal. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "(Ins

Bug#238245: Debian website's copyright and license suggestions?

2005-10-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
e agreed to by the new author. > Because copyright is currently claimed by SPI Inc, and SPI's board > meeting is coming rather soon, I brought this issue to SPI's > secretarys attention, but SPI board would appreciate some suggestion > what they should decide about license cha

Revamping the debian-legal website (was Re: removing the debian-legal website stuff?

2005-05-23 Thread Nathanael Nerode
it on high priority; I think I could get quite a lot done very quickly, since the information exists, but just has to be integrated. However, I would need website access of some sort in order to do that, which I don't have. --Nathanael Nerode -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Proposed addition to Debian web pages re: GNU FDL

2003-08-28 Thread Nathanael Nerode
I propose something like the following as an addition to the Debian web pages, at the bottom of http://www.debian.org/intro/free. I offer this up for revision and use by the Debian community, or anyone else. Motivation: some people seem to wish to remain in denial about the project's decision