<posted & mailed> Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Francesco! > > You wrote: > >> A less difficult solution is avoiding copyright assignements and simply >> asking for a license change: each copyright holder should be tracked, >> contacted and asked to agree with the relicensing. > > I'm afraid that this will turn out to be infeasable. Lots and lots of > people have contributed to the webpages. To make it even worse, a lots > of translators used to work though general cvs accounts (like "dutch" or > "french"), making it even harder to find out who did what. In that case... If you can get a legal opinion that the pages were created as works-for-hire, then SPI actually does hold the copyrights. Otherwise, you're stuck rewriting the webpages, if you want to be legal. -- Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "(Instead, we front-load the flamewars and grudges in the interest of efficiency.)" --Steve Lanagasek, http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/09/msg01056.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
