On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 12:26:08PM +0100, Alban Vidal wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
>...
> -
>
> Bellow the list of officials portages:
> - amd64
> - arm64
> - armel
> - armhf
> - i386
> - mipsel
> - mips64el
> - ppc64el
> - s390x
>...
> [1] https://www.debian.org/ports/
>...
Removing mips
Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-10-27
Severity: normal
<-- snip -->
$ lynx -dump http://packages.debian.org/skipstone
Debian package search results
_
Release Package (
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> Dans un message du 25 mar à 13:30, Adrian Bunk écrivait :
> > Could you Cc this conclusion and the location of the packages to this
> > list, too, since they are part of the AM report.
>
> I don't really see why you had such
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> Dans un message du 24 Mar à 23:58, Adrian Bunk écrivait :
> > > Beiad wants primarily to help with what he called "meta-programming".
> > > He is interested in packaging too. He launched today a discussion on
> >
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> Dans un message du 25 Mar à 0:02, Adrian Bunk écrivait :
> > He sent altogether mails to debian-policy in the last three months. i
> > can't see:
> > - Which skills valuable for Debian did he show?
> > - What doe
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Guillaume Morin wrote:
>...
> Task & skills step
> ==
>
> If Beiad considers packaging some programs, it seems more interested to
> help Debian with policy problems. Beiad has already begun to help on
> these issues (e.g
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy-
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> Dans un message du 11 mar à 23:10, Martin Michlmayr écrivait :
> > Sorry, it's not clear to me what Beiad wants to do. Anyone can help
> > with policy problems by participating in Debian's mailing lists. You
> > don't need an account for that.
>
> Be
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Christian Surchi wrote:
> AM report on Christophe Prud'homme
> by Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>...
> Tasks & Skills:
>
> * he maintains several applications/packages
> - corelinux http://corelinux.sourceforge.net (libcorelinux, libcflw,
> libcfll)
> - kfem http:/
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > Michael has provided a key and signed photo ID. (He was too far away
> > from the developers listed on the keysigning co-ordination page.)
>
> I thought we AMs are supposed to look in the member db for someone
> who could sign the key, not just on the
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Brian Russo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:10:17AM -0500, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 01:52:37AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote:
> > > is it really that hard for a "good applicant" to get
> > > advocated within a 4 week period?
> > >
> > > besides, they c
Package: bugs.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2000-10-18
Severity: important
The wnpp bugs page at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=wnpp&repeatmerged=yes
doesn't show new bugs (> 73000) although there are some (e.g. #75051).
I'm not sure if the bug is at the BTS or the WWW
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A;
Severity: normal
packages without a maintainer don't have a page that show all of their bugs.
It seems
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mypackage
doesn't find the bug reports if no maintainer is known for the package.
An example:
http
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A;
Severity: wishlist
"Debian Bug report logs: package ALL" at
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=no
counts closed bugs when saying how many bugs are on a package.
In m opinion, it would be better if only open bugs were counted.
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A;
Severity: normal
The Mailing List Archive for debian-devel at
http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/ doesn't show the mails of the
last two weeks.
14 matches
Mail list logo
