On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:47 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Do you think it would be useful to have a cert for it despite that?
Adam answered off-list: no
> There is already a redirect from debian.com to debian.org in place.
Adam pointed out off-list that there wasn't for https links.
I have fixed thi
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 7:21 AM, Stéphane Blondon wrote:
> I don't know in which repository ./machines.cgi is (at least not in the
> website repo).
DSA would very much like to kill the existing codebase behind the
db.d.o website in favour of a rewrite in django:
https://github.com/Debian/ud
The
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Thoughts?
An overhaul of the getting Debian pages is indeed long overdue.
Adrian Gibanel had some great ideas about presentation of derivatives
stuff on the website, perhaps he has some about reorganising the
'getting Debian' section of the
Hi.
I actually started looking into this today to see how much work it would be.
Some findings:
Writing a parser for DLAs is pretty simple, you can reuse a lot of the
stuff in parse-advisory.pl. If someone is interested, I can provide
the code.
The fun starts when you generate index.wml files.
Le 29/03/2016 10:31, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 09:26:23 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
>> Some combination of
>> the description, purpose, sponsor and allowedGroups LDAP fields should
>> be enough to find the right hosts and display the right info. picconi
>> and pkgmirror-1an
Hi
El 31/03/16 a las 23:04, Holger Wansing escribió:
> Ping ?
>
I've had a look at https://www.debian.org/Bugs/index and in that file
the newcomer tag is present, but not in server-control
I've had a look at the Makefile and I don't understand it very well, but
it seems that index is built base
Ping ?
Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> I have committed the fix yesterday, but it is still not visible on the
> website.
> Could someone trigger a full rebuild of the website, please?
> This seems to be needed, to get the fix onto the webpages.
--
===
Hi,
some texts which should be considered:
> * Verify your download
https://www.debian.org/CD/verify
https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#verify
> * How to write to USB
https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#write-usb
> * How to write to optical media
https://www.debian.org/CD/faq/#record-unix
https://ww
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # yes there are no changelogs for binNMUs that is intentional
> tags 422074 + wontfix
Bug #422074 [www.debian.org] packages.debian.org's changelogs for bin NMUs are
broken
Added tag(s) wontfix.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact m
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # actually nowadays it is ftp-masters job to provide changelogs
> reassign 495329 ftp.debian.org
Bug #495329 [www.debian.org] ftp.debian.org: (un)availability of package
changelogs
Bug #679298 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: Changelog of some pa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 757943 - patch
Bug #757943 [www.debian.org] please document the use of wml variables
Removed tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
757943: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 722906 818367
Bug #722906 [www.debian.org] Document additional methods for validating
Debian-distributed files
Bug #818367 [www.debian.org] Publish complete CD image signing keys over HTTPS
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
Merg
Your message dated Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:41:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by djpig fixes #804271
has caused the Debian Bug report #804271,
regarding www,debian.org: Jigdo mirrors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Thu, 31 Mar 2016 18:41:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by djpig fixes #804271
has caused the Debian Bug report #804271,
regarding .debian.org: Jigdo mirrors
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
El 31/03/16 a las 19:09, Steve McIntyre escribió:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: important
>
>
> * Replace that link with a link to a simple "Download" page which
>gives *simple* instructions and links. This would be similar to
>what we have at https://www.debian.org/distrib/ , bu
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
As pointed out in
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/201603301121.25333.lisi.re...@gmail.com
, we may be giving links to download ISO images but we're not giving
*any* useful information about the checksums and signatures for those
images in pages
Free books from Amazon! Today only!
#outlook a{padding:0;} /* Force Outlook to provide a
"view in browser" button. */
body{width:100% !important;} .ReadMsgBody{width:100%;}
.ExternalClass{width:100%;} /* Force Hotmail to display emails
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Adam Cadman wrote:
> If you go to https://www.debian.com/ you get an invalid certificate error -
> as the certificate has been issued for debian.org, not debian.com
Debian doesn't use debian.com so there isn't much point having a cert for it.
Do you think it wou
Hi,
If you go to https://www.debian.com/ you get an invalid certificate error -
as the certificate has been issued for debian.org, not debian.com
The content seems to be the same though, so if they are the same sites, why
don't you just 501 redirect all traffic to www.debian.com to www.debian.org
On 30/03/2016 19:37, Holger Wansing wrote:
on your page http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-lang-priorities
there is a link to our Debian webpage "http://www.debian.org/intro/cn#mozilla";.
We have changed the relevant page, amongst other changes: sort browsers
alphabetically; see https:
20 matches
Mail list logo
