Re: Search box and http://search.debian.org

2007-06-30 Thread MJ Ray
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] I wonder is actually somebody is working on it. If not, > would anyone object to changing the search box on the homepage to use > Google directly? I think that would be much more user-friendly. There were some helpful comments recently (were they

Re: Search box and http://search.debian.org

2007-06-30 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 03:01:01PM +0200, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > As the "we're working on it" text has been there for as long as I can > rememeber, I wonder is actually somebody is working on it. If not, > would anyone object to changing the search box on the homepage to use > Google directly? I

Bug#324142: closed by Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Re: Bug#324142: www.debian.org: Out of date translation not mentioned)

2007-06-30 Thread Helge Kreutzmann
Hello Bas, On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 01:39:10PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > You wrote: > > > I just noticed, that the german version of > > http://www.nl.debian.org/ports/powerpc/ > > which has been out of date for a few days now, is not indicated so, > > i.e. there used to be some te

Bug#342548: marked as done (www.debian.org: Please document contact address for buildd's)

2007-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:42:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#342548: www.debian.org: Please document contact address for buildd's has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#324142: marked as done (www.debian.org: Out of date translation not mentioned)

2007-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:36:17 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#324142: www.debian.org: Out of date translation not mentioned has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Bug#298759: marked as done (www.debian.org: "Why Debian" page contains paragraph that seems dated)

2007-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:21:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#298759: www.debian.org: "Why Debian" page contains paragraph that seems dated has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#263535: marked as done (Add L4 port page)

2007-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:27:53 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#263535: Any work already done? has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#298759: www.debian.org: "Why Debian" page contains paragraph that seems dated

2007-06-30 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Silas! You wrote: > The page http://www.debian.org/intro/why_debian contains a > paragraph labelled "Good system security" which begins > "Windows 95 has essentially no security." True, but > mentioning Windows 95 first makes it seem rather dated > (someone may conclude that the arguments are

Search box and http://search.debian.org

2007-06-30 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi! Currently, the search box on the homepage (in the navigation bar on the left), redirects to http://search.debian.org, which says we don't have a search at the moment, that "we're working on it", and that the user should use google in the mean time. As the "we're working on it" text has been t

Bug#263553: experimental not described on the release page

2007-06-30 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Frank! You wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:03:10PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > > > The experimental distribution is not described on the release > > page. > > Hmm, maybe we want it to only described on pages clearly intended > for developers (the task, not the status) only? No opinion o

Bug#315371: marked as done (Optimization of PNG images on the www)

2007-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:48:39 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#315371: Optimization of PNG images on the www has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#419177: marked as done (www.debian.org: network installation does not show netboot etch images.)

2007-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:21:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#419177: www.debian.org: network installation does not show netboot etch images. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#372721: marked as done (http://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing wrong)

2007-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:45:18 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#372721: http://www.debian.org/security/faq#testing wrong has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#285675: marked as done (www.debian.org: Sponsor image the one for xs4all on many mirrors.)

2007-06-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:18:37 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#285675: www.debian.org: Sponsor image the one for xs4all on many mirrors. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt