* Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-10 15:58]:
> > Need the templates to be updated manually?
>
> No, the templates are up-to-date and the Makefile dependencies
> look correct. I suspect the build is failing. tbm, could you
> send a build log?
6173:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~/nm/wml/newmaint] ma
We are WUXI TAIBAO PRECISION CASTING CO., LTD.It is a Manufacturer and
Exporter of stainless Steel, Carbon Steel , Aluminum Alloy and Alloy Steel lost
lost wax
casting products. Taibao have more than 350 employees in Taiwan headquarter and
two factories in Taiwan and one factory in China.
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:03:44PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [ please Cc: me as I am not subcribed (yet) to debian-www ]
>
> www.debian.org/devel writes:
>
> "Spelling dictionaries and tools policy
> Sub-policy for ispell dictionaries and word lists"
>
> This sub-policy now covers myspell
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:18:30AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> >From the source of the newmaint pages I believe they should use the
> same templates as w.d.o (#use wml::debian::basic NOMIRRORS=true in
> newmaint/template/nmpage.wml)
> But they seem to use an outdated version of these template
Hi.
>From the source of the newmaint pages I believe they should use the
same templates as w.d.o (#use wml::debian::basic NOMIRRORS=true in
newmaint/template/nmpage.wml)
But they seem to use an outdated version of these templates because
the trademark notice I added to the footer does not appear i
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 10:48:37PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> --- newmaint.wml 24 Jul 2003 18:33:57 - 1.45
> +++ newmaint.wml 10 Aug 2003 20:46:09 -
> @@ -9,8 +9,13 @@
> can find all the details of applying, the process details, and how to track
> the progress of ong
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 10:54:27PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 03:33:14PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > This sentence does not make much sense:
> > >
> > > Make sure that the To field of your message to the author to has only the
> > > author(s) address(es)
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 05:53:18PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-07 18:02]:
> > I, for one, would rather not have this presented here, but instead
> > leave it to the AM to decide whether to suggest it to an applicant or
> > not. I've had one or two
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 204099 + pending
Bug#204099: redundant dependency
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> retitle 204099 packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead to
> doubled dependencies
Bug#204099: redundant dependency
Changed Bug title.
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 08:21:33PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> So... post the final wording?
Proposed patch attached.
As tbm said that he liked it I will apply it tomorrow if there aren't
other objections.
Gruesse,
--
*** Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ***
*** http://www.djp
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 03:33:14PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > This sentence does not make much sense:
> >
> > Make sure that the To field of your message to the author to has only the
> > author(s) address(es) in it; put both the person who reported the bug and
> > [EMAIL PROTECT
Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2003 22:28:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204855: www.debian.org: Sentence does not make much
sense...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
tags 204099 + pending
retitle 204099 packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead to
doubled dependencies
thanks
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:10:20PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 06:42:33AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:31:00PM +020
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-10
Severity: minor
>From the page:
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer
This sentence does not make much sense:
Make sure that the To field of your message to the author to has only the
author(s) address(es) in it; put both the person who r
Hi,
We are a proud (commercial) Debian user. Could you please add us to this
list?:
http://www.debian.org/users/
Organization:
Ematic Interactive
Organization type:
Commercial
Home page:
http://www.ematic.nl
Details:
Ematic Interactive uses Debian because we think it is the most stable and
sec
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 02:03:44PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> [ please Cc: me as I am not subcribed (yet) to debian-www ]
As you wish.
> Attached patch fises that for the languages I speak myself or
> could guess how the word order is :). Translators, please correct me
> if I am wrong and you
On Sun, Aug 10, 2003 at 09:01:43PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Like so?
> >
> >Buy a computer with Debian
> >pre-installed.
> >
> > - There is one advantage to this:
> > + There are a number of advantages to this:
> >
> >
> > You don't have to install Debian.
>
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-10 14:03]:
> [ please Cc: me as I am not subcribed (yet) to debian-www ]
>
> This sub-policy now covers myspell dictionaries too.
>
> Attached patch fises that for the languages I speak myself or
> could guess how the word order is :). Translators, pl
* Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-09 08:12]:
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 09:21:44PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> I suppose there's more than one advantage (tailored install, support,
>> etc).
>
> Like so?
>
>Buy a computer with Debian
>pre-installed.
>
> - There is one
Hi,
[ please Cc: me as I am not subcribed (yet) to debian-www ]
www.debian.org/devel writes:
"Spelling dictionaries and tools policy
Sub-policy for ispell dictionaries and word lists"
This sub-policy now covers myspell dictionaries too.
Attached patch fises that for the languages I speak myse
20 matches
Mail list logo
