Re: Debian wnpp pages

2001-08-07 Thread Noel Koethe
Hello, >On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 06:19:54PM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: >> Hi! I just wanted to let you know that Debian Work-Needing and >> Prospective Packages's pages are not working now. >> They don't display any error. They simply don't display anylisting. > That's probably becaus

Re: FYI: www.debian.org/ports/mips/cpu

2001-08-07 Thread Martin Schulze
Paul Kasper wrote: > >From the manufacturer's page: > http://www.pmc-sierra.com/products/details/rm5261a/ > > Vendor/Name Date Clock ICache DCache TLB ISA Specials > (all have FPU) > QED RM5231 -150-250MHz 32K

ah-ha.com: Business proposal...

2001-08-07 Thread Jeff Bledsoe
Title: Hello,   From: Jeff BledsoeOffice: 1.800.840.1012 ext. 7159  801.705.7159 Fax:  801.705.7126     Hello,    My name is Jeff Bledsoe with ah-ha.com.  I would like to contact someone in your organization concerning a

Re: CVS webwml/english/distrib

2001-08-07 Thread Martin Schulze
Debian CVS csmall wrote: > Update of /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/distrib > In directory klecker:/tmp/cvs-serv1822 > > Modified Files: > books.wml > Log Message: > deleted url and email from Debian GNU/Linux-Anwenderhandbuch book > > --- /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/distrib/books.wml 2001

Re: glimpse version on lists.d.o

2001-08-07 Thread Josip Rodin
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 01:38:05AM -0500, Guy Maor wrote: > > However, we were using 4.1 so far... and 3.0 and 3.6 are also non-free just > > a bit more free. What's this note about then? :) > > At one point, the archive search was using 3.x, which I thought was > free. 4.x was more stable or had

Re: glimpse version on lists.d.o

2001-08-07 Thread Guy Maor
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, we were using 4.1 so far... and 3.0 and 3.6 are also non-free just > a bit more free. What's this note about then? :) At one point, the archive search was using 3.x, which I thought was free. 4.x was more stable or had some feature I really want