Reaping non-advocated applicants

G'day, (speaking as the NM website maintainer rather than an AM here) Currently the NM system does not reap (delete, remove, hide, flag, whatever) applicants that do not have an advocate and have waited for a certain amount of time. I can put a facility in that runs through the list weekly and fin

First impressions of new advocate applicants

G'day NMs, I've now processed two applicants that are under the new advocate system and I thought I'd share with you my impressions of this new way. Of course this is only on two applicants so there is obviously a large sample error. Looking at the statistics, it usually takes me about a month a

AM report for Peter van Rossum

AM report on Peter van Rossum by Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> == ID --- GPG key signed by Debian developers Joost van Baal, Joop Stakenborg, and Paul van Tilburg. Howver I could not determine wether or not Paul has signed the key as it appears his key id may of

Re: AM Report for Week Ending 11 Mar 2001

James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > New Maintainers > > === > > The following applicants became new maintainers last week: > > Fredrik Liljegren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Just for the record, Fredrik didn't become a maintainer this w

Bug#89360: marked as done (Science section not listed in http://packages.debian.org/unstable/)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:33:05 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#89360: Science section not listed in http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

NM applicant: Taral

Report for new developer applicant: Taral (JP Sugarbroad) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Summary: I recommend that Taral be accepted as a Debian developer. 2. Identification - Provided a GPG key signed by Taylor C. Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. 3. Philosophy and Proc