Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:33:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#89360: Science section not listed in 
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2001 03:44:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 11 21:44:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kukkaruukku.keltti.jyu.fi [130.234.184.31] (mail)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14cJFt-0006kO-00; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:44:21 -0600
Received: from south.invalid ([192.168.0.3] ident=mail)
        by kukkaruukku.keltti.jyu.fi with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 14cJkw-0005NJ-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 06:16:26 +0200
Received: from ajk by south.invalid with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 14cJFr-0001Z4-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 05:44:19 +0200
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 05:44:18 +0200
From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Science section not listed in http://packages.debian.org/unstable/
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-policy@lists.debian.org
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 
at 10:02:28PM -0500
Sender: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org

On 20010311T220228-0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > So, put it in "science" section.
> 
> It's not very useful if http://packages.debian.org/unstable/science 
> does not exist.  I'll start moving packages of mine when I see
> the section actually listed anywhere.

It is listed in the master overrides, and in the Packages files.  And,
because of that, in dselect.  Is that enough?

About the packages.d.o problem, it is a bug.

-- 
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 89360-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2001 20:32:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 12 14:32:11 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] (mail)
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14cYzC-0002Pi-00; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:32:10 -0600
Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 14cZ05-0000YG-00; Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:33:05 +0100
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 21:33:05 +0100
To: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#89360: Science section not listed in 
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 
at 05:44:18AM +0200
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:44:18AM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> 
> On 20010311T220228-0500, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > > So, put it in "science" section.
> > 
> > It's not very useful if http://packages.debian.org/unstable/science 
> > does not exist.  I'll start moving packages of mine when I see
> > the section actually listed anywhere.
> 
> It is listed in the master overrides, and in the Packages files.  And,
> because of that, in dselect.  Is that enough?
> 
> About the packages.d.o problem, it is a bug.

Yes, and a fixed one now. :) The unstable pages are there right now; those
for stable and testing will be created within six hours.

Basically, I needed to mkdir it. This isn't done automatically since we
don't normally add new sections...

-- 
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification

Reply via email to