Processed: no more non-free hardware :-P

2000-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 69023 wishlist Bug#69023: www.debian.org: What is "free hardware"? (in distrib/packages.wml) Severity set to `wishlist'. > merge 69023 71130 Bug#69023: www.debian.org: What is "free hardware"? (in distrib/packages.wml) Bug#71130: depends on no

Processed: retitle/reassign

2000-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 37143 lists.debian.org should use a free search engine. Bug#37143: www.debian.org: Should use a free search engine. Changed Bug title. > reassign 37143 listarchives Bug#37143: lists.debian.org should use a free search engine. Bug reassigned fro

Bug#36927: what kind of Debian CDs does JF Lehmanns ship?

2000-09-16 Thread Jürgen A. Erhard
My original PR is quite old... but the original problem (non-free not mentioned in on www.d.o) is still there, apparently (they list Netscape as included both in their 2.2 sets... for 2.1, they even list KDE 1.1...) Apart from that it's not obvious what images they sell exactly... they don't menti

Bug#36927: what kind of Debian CDs does JF Lehmanns ship?

2000-09-16 Thread Josip Rodin
Hi, I wish someone could tell us (the web people) for sure which CDs does `JF Lehmanns' sell. Their web page is at http://www.lob.de/ and it requires a German-speaking person. :) TIA. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification

Bug#70773: marked as done (case sensitive contents search slightly broken)

2000-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:40:15 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Processed: Re: #34210: www.debian.org: next/prev buttons at bottom of page too

2000-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 34210 listarchives Bug#34210: www.debian.org: next/prev buttons at bottom of page too Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `listarchives'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham

Processed: Re: Processed: retitle, merge

2000-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 70659 32214 Bug#32214: stale changelog links Bug#70659: get-changelog displays very outdated info Bug#63324: changelog link views wrong changelogs Merged 32214 63324 70659. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

Bug#70851: marked as done (Security Ann references to "Debian 2.1 (potato)" in glibc notice (2000-09-02))

2000-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:34:27 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Bug#69985: marked as done (broken link for staroffice .dsc)

2000-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 16 Sep 2000 20:27:53 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th

Processed: retitle, merge

2000-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 70659 get-changelog displays very outdated info Bug#70659: bugs.debian.org: very outdated info Changed Bug title. > merge 70659 32314 Bug number 32314 not found. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren

Processed: reassign

2000-09-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 49685 listarchives Bug#49685: pointers/archive of debian-user-de Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `listarchives'. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bu

new install manual/release notes propogated to master

2000-09-16 Thread Adam Di Carlo
I've uploaded updated Release Notes and Installation Manual for Potato to master.d.o. The main feature here is updates, especially in the French, Croatian, Polish, and Czech translations. I've had to disable the Russian PDF since it won't run for me anymore. I'd appreciate any testing of bad

Re: xx

2000-09-16 Thread Thimo Neubauer
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 10:41:42AM -0500, Thomas Bliesener wrote: > 3. http://www.debian.org/releases/ > > A section of the German version of this page contains a lot of mistakes: > > Alte Debian-Verionen > ^^ > > *

http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendors (was: Re: xx)

2000-09-16 Thread Thomas Bliesener
On Sat, Sep, 16, 2000 at 10:41:42 -0500, Thomas Bliesener wrote: [...] Sorry for the stupid topic. I forgot to change it. bli

xx

2000-09-16 Thread Thomas Bliesener
I sent a mail some days ago to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but I got no answer. Can somebody on the list take care of the following? 1. Please add us to http://www.debian.org/distrib/vendors Vendor: Mélix - Soluciones Linux URL: http://melix.com.mx URL for Debian Page: http://melix.com.mx/debian.html

Bug#71790: packages without a maintainer don't have a page that show all of their bugs

2000-09-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; Severity: normal packages without a maintainer don't have a page that show all of their bugs. It seems http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=mypackage doesn't find the bug reports if no maintainer is known for the package. An example: http

Bug#71789: "Debian Bug report logs: package ALL" counts closed bugs

2000-09-16 Thread Adrian Bunk
Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; Severity: wishlist "Debian Bug report logs: package ALL" at http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?archive=no counts closed bugs when saying how many bugs are on a package. In m opinion, it would be better if only open bugs were counted.