Re: New Search Engine?

2000-03-17 Thread Martin Schulze
James A. Treacy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 11:45:31PM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > > > > It's quite an interesting model, what they've done, here is some > > evil ascii art about it > > > > website --> indexer --> postgresql [indexing the site] > > > > search page (php) <-- postgresql

Re: New Search Engine?

2000-03-17 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Michael Stone wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 08:35:24PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: > > [22:31]:~> df > We're back to this again? I'll give you a drive if you really need it. > (But I thought the disk space issue was resolved, or at least that > people with more money

Re: New Search Engine?

2000-03-17 Thread James A. Treacy
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 08:35:24PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: > > [22:31]:~> df > 1 - 0 > Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on > /dev/hda1 693687 532056 125799 81% / > /dev/hda51659723 1110031 549692 67% /debian3 > /dev/sdb

Re: New Search Engine?

2000-03-17 Thread Michael Stone
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 08:35:24PM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote: > [22:31]:~> df We're back to this again? I'll give you a drive if you really need it. (But I thought the disk space issue was resolved, or at least that people with more money that I have were offering equipment.) > Also, it would

Re: New Search Engine?

2000-03-17 Thread Darren O. Benham
On Sat, Mar 18, 2000 at 12:19:12AM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > Darren O. Benham said: > > Baring problems from -admin, I'd suggest running it on master.. but don't > > link it into the web pages... > No, first we check it does the job, then we worry about that. > > > Here's two thoughts: > > > >

Re: New Search Engine?

2000-03-17 Thread James A. Treacy
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 11:45:31PM +1100, Craig Small wrote: > > It's quite an interesting model, what they've done, here is some > evil ascii art about it > > website --> indexer --> postgresql [indexing the site] > > search page (php) <-- postgresql [searching the site] > As long as it

Re: New Search Engine?

2000-03-17 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, Craig Small wrote: > No, first we check it does the job, then we worry about that. Yes, please try it on one of your private systems and make sure it generates the sort of output and can handle the size properly. > I believe the website without lists or bugs is about 490 M

Re: New Search Engine?

2000-03-17 Thread Craig Small
Darren O. Benham said: > Baring problems from -admin, I'd suggest running it on master.. but don't > link it into the web pages... No, first we check it does the job, then we worry about that. > Here's two thoughts: > > 1) Do the indices get created incrementally or are the indices get > recreate

Re: New Search Engine?

2000-03-17 Thread Darren O. Benham
Baring problems from -admin, I'd suggest running it on master.. but don't link it into the web pages... Here's two thoughts: 1) Do the indices get created incrementally or are the indices get recreated each run? 2) What are the size of the indices going to be? - Darren (Mental note: run ispell

New Search Engine?

2000-03-17 Thread Craig Small
G'day All, There has been an ongoing need for the Debian website to be searchable. Someone emailled the webmasters and said why not look at udmsearch (http://mysearch.udm.net/ ) so I did. It's quite an interesting model, what they've done, here is some evil ascii art about it website --> index