* "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam> Well, the *web* page I point to from the new
Adam> releases/slink/index.wml file is Gnome's page. I don't see why
Adam> Debian should maintain these instructions, and then Gnome should
Adam> maintain them also, even if Jim et al are main
Adam Di Carlo:
> I don't see why Debian should maintain these instructions, and then Gnome
> should maintain them also,
For one thing, the instructions on the Debian site are translated to several
languages, while that on the GNOME site aren't.
--
\\//
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
>* "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Adam> Since Gnome now maintains their own pages about running an
>Adam> updated gnome on slink, I've just pointed to them from the
>Adam> releases/slink/ page.
>
>Ahm, I have written these instructions. This is one text with minimal
>differenc
Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 14:41:33 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line broken link in slink install instructions
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 14:39:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome on slink
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 14:39:29 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome on slink
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 40775 boot-floppies
Bug#40775: unclear wording in Sparc docs
Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `boot-floppies'.
> reassign 42334 boot-floppies
Bug#42334: out of date information on www.debian.org
Bug reassigned from package `www.
Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 14:23:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line www.debian.org:
www.de.debian.org/releases/slink/running-kernel-2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated 06 Oct 1999 14:20:54 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line www.debian.org: running-kernel-2.2 page points to unstable
versions that depend on libc6(>=2.1)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
Adam Di Carlo writes in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (14:06:51 6 October 1999):
> Yes, but the "running slink with kernel 2.2" page *assumes* you are
> running a fully up-to-date slink. So mentioning 'makedev' explicitly
> doesn't make sense if it's already fixed in 2.1r3.
>
> All you are s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Raj Manandhar) writes:
> So the bottom line is: one needs a newer makedev. The current stable
> one works, for example. Perhaps there are similar problems for other
> packages that made it onto older slink CDs, too, so it might be a good
> idea to add the FTP site to /etc/apt/so
Package: www.debian.org
Version: current
On the page
http://www.us.debian.org/releases/stable/running-kernel-2.2
there is a list of various potentially problematic packages. makedev
should be added to the list, because the kernel pty/ttyp majors
changed in 2.2.x (in fact the change seems to be t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 46723 wishlist
Bug#46723: db.debian.org: unwanted (?) http: link from https: pages
Severity set to `wishlist'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
13 matches
Mail list logo
