Adam Di Carlo writes in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (14:06:51 6 October 1999): > Yes, but the "running slink with kernel 2.2" page *assumes* you are > running a fully up-to-date slink. So mentioning 'makedev' explicitly > doesn't make sense if it's already fixed in 2.1r3. > > All you are saying AFAICT is that you want to make sure you're all the > way up-to-date. I could add a para to this effect at the top. Would > that be sufficient?
Yes, that would be fine. (The page assumes you are up-to-date, but doesn't actually say that.) Raj
