Re: FYI: debian-legal is discussing the inclusion in the Debian archive of "erotic" interactive fiction depicting the sexual abuse of children

2014-03-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:30:38AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Due to the above, I'm going to be watching the progress of > Unteralterbach's packaging very closely in the coming months, as well > as opposing this every step of the way. If this actually makes it into > the NEW queue, I have no hes

Re: FYI: debian-legal is discussing the inclusion in the Debian archive of "erotic" interactive fiction depicting the sexual abuse of children

2014-03-14 Thread 'lesleyb'
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:07:20AM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > 2014-03-14 9:59 GMT+01:00 Jo Shields : > > *TRIGGER WARNING* in case it wasn't painfully obvious for this thread by > > now. > > Thanks for the warning. Just for the record, I can confirm that there > has been people already triggered

Re: debian-women / female GSoC candidates

2014-03-14 Thread Nicolas Dandrimont
* Daniel Pocock [2014-03-14 10:23:35 +0100]: > On 14/03/14 10:15, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > > 2014-03-14 10:02 GMT+01:00 Daniel Pocock : > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> There are several female candidates for GSoC (both in Debian and also in > >> Ganglia where I am one of the admins this year) > >> > >> I'm ju

Re: FYI: debian-legal is discussing the inclusion in the Debian archive of "erotic" interactive fiction depicting the sexual abuse of children

2014-03-14 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2014-03-14 11:30 GMT+01:00 Vincent Cheng : > (If replying to me via debian-women or debian-legal, please cc me as > I'm not subscribed to those lists.) > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > >> 3) Up to now, there hasn't been an actual proposal of package to even >> discuss, so

Re: FYI: debian-legal is discussing the inclusion in the Debian archive of "erotic" interactive fiction depicting the sexual abuse of children

2014-03-14 Thread Vincent Cheng
(If replying to me via debian-women or debian-legal, please cc me as I'm not subscribed to those lists.) On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > 3) Up to now, there hasn't been an actual proposal of package to even > discuss, so the whole debate is abstract and I don't think anyone

Re: FYI: debian-legal is discussing the inclusion in the Debian archive of "erotic" interactive fiction depicting the sexual abuse of children

2014-03-14 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2014-03-14 9:59 GMT+01:00 Jo Shields : > *TRIGGER WARNING* in case it wasn't painfully obvious for this thread by > now. Thanks for the warning. Just for the record, I can confirm that there has been people already triggered by all this situation. We can't forget that, as the "global prevalence of

Re: debian-women / female GSoC candidates

2014-03-14 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 14/03/14 10:15, Miriam Ruiz wrote: > 2014-03-14 10:02 GMT+01:00 Daniel Pocock : > >> Hi, >> >> There are several female candidates for GSoC (both in Debian and also in >> Ganglia where I am one of the admins this year) >> >> I'm just wondering if there are any female DDs who may not want to be a

Re: debian-women / female GSoC candidates

2014-03-14 Thread Miriam Ruiz
2014-03-14 10:02 GMT+01:00 Daniel Pocock : > Hi, > > There are several female candidates for GSoC (both in Debian and also in > Ganglia where I am one of the admins this year) > > I'm just wondering if there are any female DDs who may not want to be a > mentor for any arbitrary project but may par

debian-women / female GSoC candidates

2014-03-14 Thread Daniel Pocock
Hi, There are several female candidates for GSoC (both in Debian and also in Ganglia where I am one of the admins this year) I'm just wondering if there are any female DDs who may not want to be a mentor for any arbitrary project but may participate as a co-mentor on a project where there is a

Re: FYI: debian-legal is discussing the inclusion in the Debian archive of "erotic" interactive fiction depicting the sexual abuse of children

2014-03-14 Thread Jo Shields
*TRIGGER WARNING* in case it wasn't painfully obvious for this thread by now. On 14/03/14 02:21, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: > Gunnar Wolf writes: > >> Jo Shields dijo [Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:34:59PM +]: >>> Let's be very, very, very clear then. >>> >>> This is a game where you play a paedo