Don Armstrong wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> A reasonable role address which came to my mind is
>> "antiharassm...@women.d.o".
>
>As a few others have already stated, I think it would be ideal to have
>an overall alias for this, with possible additional aliases
>@women.de
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> +1 again, though I don't really buy Don's argument that harassment
> doesn't necessarily follow the usual heteronormative roles. In 99.9%
> percent of cases, it probably does.
This is actually a misconception that occurs occasionally, which often
lea
On Tuesday 14 December 2010 02:02:02 Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:15:31PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > > A reasonable role address which came to my mind is
> > > "antiharassm...@women.d.o".
> >
> > As a few others have al
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 20:15, Don Armstrong wrote:
> I would hate for someone to not report harassment occurring because
> they felt that a contact address was inappropriate for the type of
> harassment that they received (or perhaps had the appearance of
> associated with the agent of harassment
4 matches
Mail list logo
