On Tuesday 14 December 2010 02:02:02 Francesca Ciceri wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:15:31PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > A reasonable role address which came to my mind is > > > "antiharassm...@women.d.o". > > > > As a few others have already stated, I think it would be ideal to have > > an overall alias for this, with possible additional aliases > > @women.debian.org. > > > > I would hate for someone to not report harassment occurring because > > they felt that a contact address was inappropriate for the type of > > harassment that they received (or perhaps had the appearance of > > associated with the agent of harassment.[1]) > > > > Furthermore, I think a @debian.org alias sends a message that > > harassment is something that the entire project finds objectionable, > > whereas one at a subdomain indicates that only that subset may find it > > objectionable. > > > > > > Don Armstrong > > > > 1: After all, even sexual harassment doesn't necessarily follow > > heteronormative roles. > > +1 > > I completely agree with Don. > > Francesca
+1 Lisi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-women-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201012141523.39772.lisi.re...@gmail.com
