Quoting Amaya (am...@debian.org):
> Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Furthermore, I think a @debian.org alias sends a message that
> > harassment is something that the entire project finds objectionable,
> > whereas one at a subdomain indicates that only that subset may find it
> > objectionable.
>
> +1 T
Don Armstrong wrote:
> Furthermore, I think a @debian.org alias sends a message that
> harassment is something that the entire project finds objectionable,
> whereas one at a subdomain indicates that only that subset may find it
> objectionable.
+1 This argument completely changed my mind.
--
ยท
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:15:31PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > A reasonable role address which came to my mind is
> > "antiharassm...@women.d.o".
>
> As a few others have already stated, I think it would be ideal to have
> an overall alias for t
On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> A reasonable role address which came to my mind is
> "antiharassm...@women.d.o".
As a few others have already stated, I think it would be ideal to have
an overall alias for this, with possible additional aliases
@women.debian.org.
I would hate for
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> It would be nice if people can comment further in which among the two
> they prefer.
I, as Erinn, tend to prefer the women-specifc scope for the moment.
It can later broaden, as we gain experience and see how this develops.
Start small, and take care of more issues wh
2010/12/13 Kevin Mark
> [snip]
>
> a few point to note:
> as someone mentioned, why make it to @w.d.o vs @d.o. The form of harrasment
> may
> not be based on gender, so not sure why it would go to a project email
> address
> that (I am guessing) is for 'debian women' issue??
>
> Why have the li
2010/12/13 Stefano Zacchiroli
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 08:36:22PM +0100, Rayna wrote:
> > I have been thinking about a global "anti-harassment committee". That
> > is, a group of people involved not only in one community, but coming
> > from various ones who could be contacted via a mail in case
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:18 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 02:00:25PM +0300, Erinn Clark wrote:
> > > From other replies it seems to me that something like
> > > "antiharassm...@d.o" will be more acceptable. I'll wait for some more
> > > feedback and then proceed request
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 02:00:25PM +0300, Erinn Clark wrote:
> > From other replies it seems to me that something like
> > "antiharassm...@d.o" will be more acceptable. I'll wait for some more
> > feedback and then proceed requesting its creation as an alias initially
> > pointing to Amaya and Patt
On 13 December 2010 11:24, Kevin Mark wrote:
> as someone mentioned, why make it to @w.d.o vs @d.o. The form of harrasment
> may
> not be based on gender, so not sure why it would go to a project email
> address
> that (I am guessing) is for 'debian women' issue??
>
> Why have the link on the DW
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 08:19:54PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ Please Cc:-me on replies/follow-ups ]
>
> I've been asked to declare an anti-harassment policy for Debian Sprints
> and I'll be happy to do that. Discussing with the proposers (Lars and
> Amaya) the obvious question of "who th
* Stefano Zacchiroli [2010:12:13 09:26 +0100]:
> From other replies it seems to me that something like
> "antiharassm...@d.o" will be more acceptable. I'll wait for some more
> feedback and then proceed requesting its creation as an alias initially
> pointing to Amaya and Patty.
I'm in favor of
2010/12/13 Anne Ghisla :
>> For what concern me, I think it could be a great chance. And I'm available to
>> organize it (with some help) :)
>
> I fully second the proposal, and am willing to help in organise it! I
> participated to DUCC-IT and I look forward for more discussion on the
> topic.
I
On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 16:01 +0100, Francesca Ciceri wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi all,
> as you can see here [1] there is a second call for talk submission for FOSDEM
> 2011 distros miniconf.
> On #debian-women chan Lars Wirzenius has launched an interesting idea: why not
> try to organize a UbuntuWomen/D
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 08:36:22PM +0100, Rayna wrote:
> I have been thinking about a global "anti-harassment committee". That
> is, a group of people involved not only in one community, but coming
> from various ones who could be contacted via a mail in case of any
> mistreatment.
Frankly speakin
15 matches
Mail list logo
