On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 15:18 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 02:00:25PM +0300, Erinn Clark wrote: > > > From other replies it seems to me that something like > > > "antiharassm...@d.o" will be more acceptable. I'll wait for some more > > > feedback and then proceed requesting its creation as an alias initially > > > pointing to Amaya and Patty. > > > > I'm in favor of minimizing the scope for the reasons Zack mentioned > > and when there's some level of consensus I can setup the alias. > > According to what I can see in this thread, there is consensus to create > a central contact point and also the volunteers to be behind it. > Nevertheless, while the proposal was about a @women.d.o address (which > Erinn is ready to set up), there has also been the proposal of using a > @d.o address (in which case it should be me requesting the alias setup > to DSA). > > I see advantages and disadvantages (all minor) with both @women.d.o and > @d.o addresses. > > It would be nice if people can comment further in which among the two > they prefer.
Hello Stefano, all, I give a +1 for the activation of two addresses, the specific and the generic one. I think that providing the generic one will help in identifying other forms of harassment that we are not yet considering. Let me know how I can help! Anne -- http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Aghisla
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
