Hi,
What is the status of packaging Eclipse 3.1 for Debian? It seems like it
has been started many times, but never finished.
I would be interested in contributing, but would prefer to pick up where
others left of.
Charles
--
A man who passes
On hills and curves
Is not a man
Of iron nerves--
H
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-simpletest
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Marcus Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.lastcraft.com/simple_test.php
* License : The Open Grou
> > * License : The Open Group Test Suite License
>
> I'm not optimistic about this licence being DFSG-free.
Hi,
I was wondering if Debian-legal could offer any insight on this matter.
I searched the mailing list archives, and found no explicit discussion
of this license. The only potent
I would like to help maintain it. I would enjoy working with others, but
I would be up to attepting it on my own if not (though that would of
course introduce some delay in the process). As the previous owners seem
to have gone mute, perhaps it is time to change ownership of this bug?
Charles
---
Hi,
I am attempting to contact anyone who has previously expressed an
interest in packaging a new Eclipse release for Debian. I grabbed
everyone from the ITA, as well as the Alioth project, and the Java list
for good measure. :-)
Al Stone and I would like to work on packaging a new Eclipse releas
> On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 16:42 -0400, Charles Fry wrote:
> > I am attempting to contact anyone who has previously expressed an
> > interest in packaging a new Eclipse release for Debian. I grabbed
> > everyone from the ITA, as well as the Alioth project, and the Java list
> > I am attempting to contact anyone who has previously expressed an
> > interest in packaging a new Eclipse release for Debian. I grabbed
> > everyone from the ITA, as well as the Alioth project, and the Java list
> > for good measure. :-)
>
> I have CCed Michael Koch. He is working on 3.1 packa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fortunes-bible
Version : 0.0.20020527/
Upstream Author : Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://fortunebible.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
I have a preliminary version of this package ready at:
http://debian.frogcircus.org/
After a little more testing and a little more documentation, it should
be ready to uplaod.
Any feedback is welcome.
Charles
--
Pity all
The mighty Caesars
They pulled
Each whisker out
With tweezers
Burma-S
Michael,
Thank you for the work that you have gone through in creating this
package.
Can I ask what your plans are for uploading this into Debian?
thanks,
Charles
-Original Message-
> From: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: New eclipse 3.1 packages uploaded
> Date: Fri, 19 Aug
The previous bug has dissapeared. The current problem is that
phpDocumentor is currently released under the problematic PHP License.
Upstream has agreed to release under another licence, after which this
package should be ready. :-)
Charles
--
Join
Our happy
Brushless throng
Six million users
Ca
> In the future, please try to find out if your package is part of some
> transition, in order not to interfere with it. The Release Team is
> also aware this information is not very easily accessible, and will
> think of ways of improving the situation.
First of all, I apologize for compl
Documentation is currently broken due to bug #328313. Once this is
resolved, bouncycastle will be ready for upload.
Charles
--
Leap year's over
You're safe, men
All you cowards
Can shave again
With brushless
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1949/leap_years_over
signature.asc
Descript
> The plans are to wait for libtomcat5-java and liblucene-java to be in
> unstable/main. libtomcat5-java should be there tomorrow. liblucene-java
> can take a while as we need to fix some rmic issues first to be able to
> build it with a completely free toolchain.
>
> When this is sorted out and n
This package is currently being held up by the hep.aida package which is
included with the source code. The source files don't contain any
licensing information, and the colt package documentation claims an LGPL
with a military prohibition (non-free). However an analysis of the
upstream CVS reposit
retitle 375070 php-pear: pear and pecl memory limits too low
thanks
Hi,
I just wanted to emphasize the importance of addressing this for both
pear and pecl. Currently bug #206536 is dependent on this being resolved
for pear.
thanks,
Charles
--
Hat and tie
Smart and clean
Space between
Spoiled
retitle 345903 RFP: sharpmusique -- The fair interface to the iTunes Music Store
owner 345903 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
Well, after having prepared a package based on Christian Marillat's
unofficial package, I started looking at ways for sharpmusique to depend
on other packages that provided the vl
When packaging this, please be aware of the Java policy, section 2.4:
"Java libraries packages must be named libXXX[version]-java (without
the brackets), where the version part is optional and should only
contain the necessary part. The version part should only be used to
avoid naming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: courieruserinfo
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Andrew St. Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.arda.homeunix.net/store/
* License : GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: courierpasswd
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Andrew St. Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.arda.homeunix.net/store/
* License : GPL
retitle 227783 ITA: xasteroids X-based asteroids-style arcade game
owner 227783 Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
--
If you
Don't know
Whose signs
These are
You can't have
Driven very far
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1942/if_you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
retitle 244693 ITP courierpassd -- Change courier user passwords using
poppassd interface
owner 244693 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks
I am currently working with Racke to get a courier-dev package with the
libraries necessary for courierpassd to work (bug #314354).
Once that is in place, I'll complete
Thijs,
Thanks for putting this package together. Do you have someone to upload
this package for you?
Charles
--
If you want
A hearty squeeze
Get our
Female
Anti-freeze
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1963/if_you_want
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I need to create some Debian packages from PEAR modules. Is pear-package
ready for general use? Are you going to upload it to Debian soon, or
should I grab it from the Subversion archive?
Does it take precedence over the "Policy for PEAR modules" I found at:
http://www.madism.org/debian.p
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-pager
Version : 2.3.2
Upstream Author : Lorenzo Alberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Richard
Heyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/packa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: php-cache-lite
Version : 1.4.1
Upstream Author : Fabien Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pear.php.net/package/Cache_Lite/
* License : LGPL
Descripti
> It is in incoming queue for a few month and stucked, because there is no
> official php5 packages. I'm using pear-package for packaging php4 extensions,
> too.
Shouldn't you be able to upload it with nothing but php4 dependencies,
to allow short-term progress here?
> I think we should talk ab
> > It is in incoming queue for a few month and stucked, because there is no
> > official php5 packages. I'm using pear-package for packaging php4
> > extensions,
> > too.
>
> Shouldn't you be able to upload it with nothing but php4 dependencies,
> to allow short-term progress here?
For that m
owner 206536 Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
Well, as this is still up in the air, I'll grab it. :-)
Charles
--
Heaven's
Latest
Neophyte
Signalled left
Then turned right
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1952/heavens
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
php-cache-lite and php-pager are both ready:
http://debian.frogcircus.org/packages/
I am just waiting a few days to upload them, pending any responses to
the following debian-webapps discussion:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-webapps/2005/06/msg00041.html
Charles
--
A better buy -- why
This package is currently waiting on pear bug #315594, which prevents
the proper installation of phpdocumenter.
Charles
--
All these years
Your skin
Has dried
Why not moisten
Up your hide
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1936/all_these_years
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatu
retitle 234048 ITP: bouncycastle -- Bouncy Castle Crypto
owner 234048 Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
Now that I have a little more Debian packaging experience, I'll give
this another shot. :-)
Charles
--
Why is it
When you
Try to pass
The guy in front
Goes twice as fast?
As far as I can tell your offer for adoption still stands; in any case
version 1.0 still has not been uploaded. I am not currnetly a developer,
but I am interested in becoming one, and as I actively use usemod-wiki I
would love to maintain it.
Charles
--
To get
Away from
Hairy apes
Ladies jump
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: phpgedview
Version : 2.65
Upstream Author : John Finlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://phpgedview.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Description : Online genealogy viewer
The PhpGedView Project dynamicall
Julian,
Are you still planning on maintaining usemod-wiki? As the new version
still has not been packaged, and several months have elapsed since you
expressed your intent to do so, I thought I would once again express my
interest in working with someone to maintain usemod-wiki. As previously
menti
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: bouncycastle
Version : 1.22
Upstream Author : Legion of the Bouncy Castle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.bouncycastle.org/
* License : based on MIT X Consortium license
Description : Bouncy Castle Cr
Hi,
Per some recent discussion[1] on debian-legal that has resulted in the
removal of RC bugs on PHP Group projects that use the PHP License, I
would recommend that you try uploading your package, and if the FTP
Masters are not happy, point them to this recent discussion. They should
either update
Hi Stephan,
Any luck with the XOM package?
cheers,
Charles
--
I just joined
The young man said
A nudist camp
Is my face red?
No! I use
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1935/i_just_joined
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> Can you please tell me exactly which files do you need for
> courierpasswd 1.1.0 ?
>
> Courier packages with courier-authlib are available from experimental
> or from my private repository:
>
> deb http://debian.linuxia.de main courier-test
Excelent! The current courier-authlib and courier-aut
> Now that phpdoc has switched to the LGPL licence, can it now be
> packaged for debian?
>
> if so anyone planning on doing it soon?
Hi Chris,
I am glad to hear that they finally completed the licence switch. While
I have a long-term interest in this package, I won't be able to work on
it right
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcolt-java
Version :
Upstream Author : Wolfgang Hoschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dsd.lbl.gov/~hoschek/colt/
* License : BSD(ish) and LGPL
Prog
ng Project. Any oposition to me importing it into the repository?
cheers,
Charles
- Forwarded message from Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcolt-java
Version :
Upst
Hi,
Is there any legal reason why sharpmusique is not in Debian, given that
multiple .deb packages already exist?
Charles
--
Our fortune
Is your
Shaven face
It's our best
Advertising space
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1953/our_fortune
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> Subject: Re: Bug#314354: status of courier-dev
> Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 10:48:10 +0200
> To: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> version: 0.53.1-1
>
> Charles Fry wrote:
> >>Can you please tel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libjung-java
Version : 1.7.4
Upstream Author : Joshua O'Madadhain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: J
Just waiting for a sponsor or for the DAM to approve my application,
whichever happens first. :-)
Charles
--
Nix on nicks
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1939/nix_on_nicks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> > Just waiting for a sponsor or for the DAM to approve my application,
> > whichever happens first. :-)
>
> Have you done something else than just waiting sit in order to get the
> sponsor?
Well, I posted to debian-mentors, which I understood to be the proper
protocol:
http://lists.debian.o
It looks like PhpGedView 4.0 Beta 8 was recently released. It also
appears that there is about one month between each beta release. Given
that, perhaps it is worth getting this beta version packaged and uplaod
to Debian, at the very least to experimental.
Charles
--
The cannoneers
With hairy ear
By way of update, I am currently working with upstream to include the
license in the header of all files (currently it is only in most), and
in a text file in the source distribution.
Charles
--
Best reference -- public preference
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1939/best_reference
Can I ask again if anyone is interested in checking and sponsoring
courierpassd?
thanks,
Charles
-Original Message-
> From: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: RFS: courierpassd
> Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 00:57:58 -0400
> To: debian-mentor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: glastree
Version : 1.03
Upstream Author : Jeremy Wohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://igmus.org/code/
* License : public domain
Description : builds live backup trees, with branches for each day
The poor
> In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> operates?
glastree provides a subset of the functionality of dirvish. It is
actually most closely related pdumpfs. Like pdumpfs, glastree works
locally and not
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:59:09PM -0500, Charles Fry wrote:
> > > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > > operates?
> >
> > glastree provides a sub
> > > Is there any benefit to using glastree over dirvish or pdumpfs?
> >
> > The advantage of using glastree over pdumpfs is that it is implemented
> > in Perl rather than Ruby (this is in fact the reason that I encountered
> > it in the first place).
>
> How is that an advantage of use?
Well
> > In what ways is this package different to, say, dirvish, which I use
> > in a manner which is, AFAICS, identical to the way this package
> > operates?
>
> Or storebackup?
>
> (Actually, storebackup's one-line description doesn't really hint at
> this functionality. But I'm using it to create
> > Well, if one had a small system and desired not to install ruby, it
> > would still be possible to obtain pdumpfs' functionality. Of course
> > that could be called an installation issue rather than a usability
> > issue.
>
> 3314kB, including pdumpfs itself. I'll donate a 32MB USB key to sto
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xom
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Elliotte Rusty Harold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.xom.nu/
* License : LGPL
Description : tree-based API fo
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: hibernate
Version : 3.0.5
Upstream Author : hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
* URL : http://www.hibernate.org/
* License : LGPL
Description : a object/rela
owner 330239 Barry Hawkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks
> I have been working on the dependencies for Hibernate for a few
> months now, and have not yet filed the ITP. Please contact me, I am
> part of the pkg-java-maintainers team.
Well, then you should definitely take ownership of this ITP,
> did you already made this package ?
> where can I found it ?
The package is currently on hold, while upstream switches to a
Debian-compatible license.
Charles
--
It's best for
One who hits
The bottle
To let another
Use the throttle
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1940/its_best_for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libjgrapht-java
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Barak Naveh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://jgrapht.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description :
Oh, and I forgot to mention that a preliminary package is available at:
http://debian.frogcircus.org/packages/
Charles
--
Early to bed
Early to rise
Was meant for those
Old fashioned guys
Who don't use
Burma-Shave
http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1943/early_to_bed
signature.asc
Description:
> * Package name: php-net-imap
> Version : 1.0.3
> Upstream Author : Damian Alejandro Fernandez Sosa
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://pear.php.net/package/Net_IMAP
> * License : php license
You should be aware that per the current REJECT_FAQ [1]
your pac
> Thanks for the information. I haven't noticed it before because I saw various
> packages in Debian using the PHP license.
> I told my sponsor to wait with the upload. I will ask him for upload when PHP
> license is DFSG compatible or tell him to drop it if the project disagree
> with the PHP l
> > >2. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00066.html
>
> the project decision is clear IMHO : read the php license, you'll see it
> can only apply to the main and official PHP distribution.
Please read the message to debian-legal that I originally referenced. It
outlines recent
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: netlogger
Version : 2.2.5
Upstream Author : Dan Gunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www-didc.lbl.gov/NetLogger/
* License : GPL
Description : distributed system logging tool
Instrument distributed app
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tmda-cgi
Version : 0.13
Upstream Author : Gre7g Luterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://tmda.net/tmda-cgi/
* License : GPL
Description : TMDA web-based management frontend
This is a web-based management
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: webmin-awstats
Version : 1.21
Upstream Author : Laurent Destailleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://awstats.sourceforge.net/docs/awstats_webmin.html
* License : GPL
Description : awstats control module fo
Just to be clear on this, my intent is to package all of the Bouncy
Castle libraries. The resulting Debian packages will be something like:
libbcprov-jdk14-java
libbcprov-jdk13-java
libbcprov-jdk12-java
libbcjce-jdk13-java
libbcjce-jdk12-java
libbcmail-jdk14-java
libbcmail-j
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: courierpassd
Version : 0.30
Upstream Author : Andrew St. Jean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.arda.homeunix.net/store/
* License : GPL
Description : Change courier user passwords using poppassd interf
I am withdrawing my ITP, as this package ended up being a bit more
complicated than initially anticipated. At first, I thought it would be
sufficient to simply package the signed jars, but per [1]this discussion
on the debian-java mailing list, the idea of obtaining a Debian
Certificate for signing
It has now been 160 days since usemod-wiki was offered for adoption. If
it is going to be adopted, then I would love to see the latest release
packaged. If the current adoption is not going to work out, I would love
to help maintain usemod-wiki.
Charles
--
Missin'
Kissin'?
Perhaps your thrush
Ca
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: scpjailer
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Tony J. White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://tjw.org/scpjailer/
* License : GPL
Description : sets up a directory for use with scponly
scpjailer is a self extra
> I don't want to steal anyone's ITP, but as there has been no activity
> on on #223781, I'd like to step forward and adopt usemod-wiki. I'd be
> interested in others helping out, though (Charles?).
>
> This version fixes 3 outstanding bugs. The TODO files contains a list of
> things I'll work out
an or Benjamin indicate otherwise, Christoph and I
would like to move forward with a new usemod-wiki package next week.
thanks,
Charles
-Original Message-
> From: Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: usemod-wiki adoption
> Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 00:15:09 -0400
Kai,
Are you still planning to package libemail-simple-perl? I need to use
it, and would love to get it straight from Debian. I'd be glad to help
out if necessary.
Charles
--
Buy a tube
Use it one week
If you then want
Your money back
Send us the tube
Burma-Shave
http://frogcircus.org/burmashav
Note that the bug is owned by Chris Seufert, who is currently the one
working on this. I suspect that given the current state of the package he'd
be willing to accept contributions if you're interested in helping out. If
you don't hear back from him (after a reasonable amount of time) you can
assi
77 matches
Mail list logo
