Bug#953523: ITP: filetype.py -- Small module to infer binary file types via signature

2020-03-10 Thread Eriberto
Em ter., 10 de mar. de 2020 às 01:21, Scott Kitterman escreveu: > > Based on the module name and Python policy, the binary package name should be > python3-filetype. That appears to be available. I'd suggest using that as > the source package name too to make your life easier. Thanks Scott! I

Bug#953523: ITP: filetype.py -- Small module to infer binary file types via signature

2020-03-10 Thread Eriberto
Em ter., 10 de mar. de 2020 às 11:54, Eriberto escreveu: > > Em ter., 10 de mar. de 2020 às 01:21, Scott Kitterman > escreveu: > > > > Based on the module name and Python policy, the binary package name should > > be python3-filetype. That appears to be available. I'd suggest using that > > a

Bug#953565: ITP: libjcat -- JSON Catalog library

2020-03-10 Thread Mario Limonciello
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mario Limonciello * Package name: libjcat Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Richard Hughes * URL : https://github.com/hughsie/libjcat * License : LGPL 2.1+ Programming Lang: C Description : JSON Catalog library

Bug#953574: ITP: python-pysol-cards -- Deal PySol FC Cards

2020-03-10 Thread Juhani Numminen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Juhani Numminen * Package name: python-pysol-cards Version : 0.8.8 Upstream Author : Shlomi Fish * URL : https://github.com/shlomif/pysol_cards * License : Expat Programming Lang: Python Description : Deal PySol

Bug#953579: ITP: vir2-p2v -- Convert a physical machine to use KVM

2020-03-10 Thread Hilko Bengen
Package: wnpp Owner: Hilko Bengen Severity: wishlist * Package name: virt-p2v Version : 1.42.0 Upstream Author : Red Hat Inc. * URL or Web page : https://libguestfs.org/ * License : GPL2+ Description : Convert a physical machine to use KVM As of version 1.42.0, virt

Bug#953523: ITP: filetype.py -- Small module to infer binary file types via signature

2020-03-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
It's ok. Python policy only addresses binary package name. Scott K

Bug#644757: Removing ocaml-book?

2020-03-10 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Control: retitle -1 RM: ocaml-book -- RoQA: unmaintained, partial, non-free, bogus source format On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 23:38:19 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > since ocaml-book is: > - orphaned since 2011 and > - in non-free and > - a small subset of what a user ge

Processed: Re: Bug#644757: Removing ocaml-book?

2020-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Bug #644757 [wnpp] O: ocaml-book -- English book: "Developing applications with Objective Caml" Bug reassigned from package 'wnpp' to 'ftp.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #644757 to the same values previously

Bug#953523: ITP: filetype.py -- Small module to infer binary file types via signature

2020-03-10 Thread Eriberto
Em ter., 10 de mar. de 2020 às 17:52, Scott Kitterman escreveu: > > It's ok. Python policy only addresses binary package name. > > Scott K Ok, thanks!

Bug#899425: O: gkremldk -- mldonkey plugin for gkrellm2

2020-03-10 Thread Guillem Jover
Control: retitle -1 RM: gkremldk -- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, bogus source format Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org Hi! I was about to NMU this package to fix its source format not matching its version format, then I noticed that upstream has just disappeared.

Processed: Re: Bug#899425: O: gkremldk -- mldonkey plugin for gkrellm2

2020-03-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > retitle -1 RM: gkremldk -- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, bogus source > format Bug #899425 [wnpp] O: gkremldk -- mldonkey plugin for gkrellm2 Changed Bug title to 'RM: gkremldk -- RoQA; dead upstream, unmaintained, bogus source format' from 'O: gkremldk -- mld

Bug#924040: #924040 ITP: archivebox -- open source self-hosted web archive

2020-03-10 Thread Dmitry Smirnov
Dear colleagues, I mourn loss of Scrapbook and ArchiveBox appears to be a viable alternative. I've noticed this ITP but since there are no signs of initial packaging I took the liberty of making a first draft: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/archivebox Let's work together on it, shall we? I