Am Montag, den 26.03.2007, 16:08 +0200 schrieb Daniel Baumann:
> I would like to adopt file if you agree.
No objections, it is yours.
--
|=| Michael Piefel
|=| Member of the Debian project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Hi.
I would love to see this in the official repositories as well. I would
share the debian/* directories of the MSP binutils and the tinyos
packages I have created. Integration with avr toolchain would be nice
as well. But as those were the first deb packages I created, I doubt that
they are mat
On 24-Mar-2007 23:44.02 (GMT), Robert Millan wrote:
> > Never the less, if it's decided that nspluginwrapper should go into
> > contrib,
> > then into contrib it should go.
> I suppose that we're deciding that as we speak :-)
I neglected to mention, I updated the package found at
http://chora
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:46:00AM +0100, Rob Andrews wrote:
> On 24-Mar-2007 23:44.02 (GMT), Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Never the less, if it's decided that nspluginwrapper should go into
> contrib,
> > > then into contrib it should go.
> > I suppose that we're deciding that as we speak :-)
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 410970 pending
Bug#410970: ITP: kirocker -- Kicker applet that displays what you listen to in
Amarok.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 412473 pending
Bug#412473: ITP: sine
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: remuco
Version : 0.4.3 (server), 0.5.0 (client)
Upstream Author : masala |at| web |dot| de
URL : http://remuco.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Description : mobile phone remote music control
>From the web page:
"Re
Btw. upstream already provides Ubuntu packages,
so hopefully packaging for Debian is easy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : gtk-vim-syntax
Version : 20061121
Upstream Author : David Necas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1000
* License : Public domain
Description : Syntax file to highlight gtk+ keywords in vim
A collection of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 416380 !
Bug#416380: ITP: gtk-vim-syntax -- Syntax file to highlight gtk+ keywords in vim
Owner recorded as Laurent Bigonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416263: fixed in file 4.20-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
I made a tarball of my work from last year on packaging Open Watcom.
I doubt I will ever work on it further. It contains a control file, a
rules file (I don't know how well it works), and a TODO file. The
rules and TODO files contain useful tips for anyone who ever wants to
package OW.
The tarb
All: FYI, I just found out today that someone named blairdude has
kindly made unofficial .debs (and .rpms made with Alien) for Open
Watcom available. I haven't tried them. They appear to be .debs of a
few-month-old release candidate of OW. They are available at:
http://blairdude.googlepages.co
i've been talking to a debian developer about this. there is a fair
amount of red tape that packages must meet, and he is looking into it
what should be submitted and how.
as of now, i'll be maintaining our current ubuntu packages and trying to
come up with a more mature packaging environment.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Arnaud Cornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: haproxy
Version : 1.2.17
Upstream Author : Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://haproxy.1wt.eu/
* License : GPL
Description : fast and reliable load balan
Hi,
We finally got in touch with the Teosto lawyer, and he informed us that
unfortunately the game's music can't be distributed with a CC license.
The problem is while the songs can freely be distributed with the game,
they can't be distributed or otherwise used independently of the game
with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> owner 410556 !
Bug#410556: ITP: openmsx-debugger -- graphical debugger for openMSX
Owner changed from joost yervante damad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Joost Yervante
Damad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
On 3/27/07, leith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i've been talking to a debian developer about this. there is a fair
amount of red tape that packages must meet, and he is looking into it
what should be submitted and how.
as of now, i'll be maintaining our current ubuntu packages and trying to
come u
Package: wnpp
Owner: Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
*** Please type your report below this line ***
* Package name: dfu-programmer
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Weston Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://dfu-programmer.sourceforge.net/
*
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> retitle 413523 ITP: plexus-utils -- common utilities for the Plexus framework
Bug#413523: ITP: plexus-utils -- common utilities for the Plexus
Changed Bug title to ITP: plexus-utils -
2007/3/27, Sami Kyöstilä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We finally got in touch with the Teosto lawyer, and he informed us that
unfortunately the game's music can't be distributed with a CC license.
The problem is while the songs can freely be distributed with the game,
they can't be distributed or o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 414747 + ITP
Unknown tag/s: ITP.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etc
http://uvw.ru/debian/iat/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 242736 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242736: netkit-inetd: warning in the manual
Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> submitter 263367 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#263367: xml2: too old standards version
Changed B
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 414747 ITP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso
Bug#414747: RFP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso
Changed Bug title to ITP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso from
RFP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM imag
2007/3/27, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Do you think the song in the tutorial
classifies as song in itself? What does teosto say about that song in
concrete?
Oops, missed your message due while I wrote my previous messages today
:-( due to buggy threading logic.
Sami has said
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 356705 pending
Bug#356705: libboost-filesystem-dev: missing boost_filesystem-mt links
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 410157 pending
Bug#410157: libboost-serialization-dev
First off, thanks to all involved for working through this; legal
stuff is annoying, but getting it right early makes it all worthwhile
in the end.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> We have a question about the default songs for the guitar-simulation
> game Frets On Fire. (We would like t
Hi all, hi Don; thanks for your input.
2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[parts snipped]
There's really no point to drafting such a license, because it would
not be acceptable for main, and more to the point, Teosto would have
to vet it. Teosto's lawyers should really be the o
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than we would get if
> Teosto wrote one?
The following is what I would use
2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than we would get if
> Teos
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> 2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote:
> >> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a
> >> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could
> >> get Teosto to agr
On 3/28/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, it actually seems rather strange to me for an organization which
is designed to "protect" artists disallowing artists from determining
how their own works are licensed, so I'm trying to give them the
benifit of the doubt here.
Do they r
32 matches
Mail list logo
