Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:21:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line pyopengl-2.0 is packaged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pygestor
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : Fernando San Martin Woerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.galilea.cl/gestor/
* License : GPL
Description : Accounting software for chilean companies
(Incl
Hi again,
Thank you for submitting your information online inquiring about
refinancing your home. I am just writing you a quick note to let
you know that we are accepting your mo rtgage application. You can
get a $200,000 loa n for $330/month payment. Appr oval process will
take 1 minute, then
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ncmpc
Version : 0.11.0-1
Upstream Author : Kalle Wallin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://hem.bredband.net/kaw/apps/ncmpc
* License : GPL
Description : An ncurses client for Music Player Daemon (MPD)
ncmpc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: wpbl
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Jem Berkes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://wpbl.pc9.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Weighted Private Block List
Bayes-type filtering, which is a blocklist for IP
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: spambayes
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Tim Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : Python Software foundation
Description : Bayesian spam classification system with Python
T
Eric Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: ncmpc
> Version : 0.11.0-1
> Upstream Author : Kalle Wallin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://hem.bredband.net/kaw/apps/ncmpc
> * License : GPL
> Description :
Partially done packaging here, mainly to alleviate my need to have to
on all the machines I end up using.
This is focused on aba and bash-completion, but I also added
tla-full-changelog.
I'm not sure when I'll get around to properly documenting/testing all of
it, since it's a big package (feature
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 01:28, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Priority: wishlist
>
>Package name: netapplet
> Version: 0.98.0
> Upstream Author: Robert Love
> URL: http://primates.ximian.com/~rml/netapplet/
> Description: netapplet is a GNOME applet for managing n
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:58:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:58:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:58:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:55:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:55:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:51:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gmpc
Version : 0.11.1
Upstream Author : Martijn Koedam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.MusicPD.org/?page=gmpc
* License : GPL
Description : Gnome Music Player Client (graphical interface to MPD)
A G
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:55:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:51:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:51:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:51:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:55:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:55:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:58:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:05:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:05:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:02:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:05:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:02:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:02:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:02:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:02:12 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:05:40 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:23:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:29:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This has already been packaged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:26:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:26:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:26:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:23:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:23:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:26:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:23:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:23:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:31:52 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Already packaged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 97672 RFP: kernel-image-owl -- security enhanced kernelimage
Bug#97672: RFP: kernel-image-harden -- security enhanced kernelimage
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 97673 RFP: kernel-patch-owl -- Collection of security providing
> kernel-patches
Bug
retitle 97672 RFP: kernel-image-owl -- security enhanced kernelimage
retitle 97673 RFP: kernel-patch-owl -- Collection of security providing
kernel-patches
thanks
This RFPs have been renamed as LIDS is already packaged in Debian.
Remove
fro nirvanayardage dying stopwatchkingfisher
amra ephemerisdaphne pigtail dissociabletypology
eastwood alumnustactful astoria beastiedibble
appanage clearanceah colombia daviessuccinct
amphioxis bundeletion epicurean prombelieve
livery bystandercontravention excitatory xpenitenti
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:23:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: etpan
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : DINH Viet Hoa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://libetpan.sourceforge.net/etpan/
* License : BSD
Description : console mail user agent based on libEtPan!
Features:
*
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 05:15:08PM +0200, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> XMLdiff is a python tool that figures out the differences between two
> similar XML files, in the same way the diff utility does it for text
> files. It can be used as a python library or as a command line tool.
What makes xmldif
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 09:31:33AM -0400, Dan Weber wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 05:15:08PM +0200, Alexandre Fayolle wrote:
> > XMLdiff is a python tool that figures out the differences between two
> > similar XML files, in the same way the diff utility does it for text
> > files. It can be use
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 09:31:33AM -0400,
Dan Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 33 lines which said:
> What makes xmldiff different from diff.
diff operates at the text level. It knows nothing about the syntax.
xmldiff operates at the XML tree level. It displays only significant
di
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:26:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Hi, even if I'm not an official DD (I'm actually in the New Debian
Maintainer process) I'd like to help you for maintaining parted.
I'm also planning to develop a python gtk-based interface (like
qparted) for gnome, so I think helping in maintaining parted can
be very interesting for me.
Thank
* Eric Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-25 02:29]:
> > Upstream Author : Kalle Wallin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://hem.bredband.net/kaw/apps/ncmpc
The requested URL /kaw/apps/ncmpc was not found on this server.
> My sponsor for mpd is busy, so other sponsors are welcome.
Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:20:26 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
I am going to need this package for the new version of sms-pl I
maintain. If noone wants to package pcre++, I'm going to have to :-/
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216 FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75 D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: groovy
Version : 1.0beta6
Upstream Author : Groovy Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://groovy.codehaus.org/
* License : BSD/Apache style license
(http://cvs.groovy.codehaus.org
I've looked at the packages, and saw a few problems:
* missing build dependency on python (this stops dh_python which uses
/usr/bin/python
* missing build-dependency on g77 for python-scipy
* some binary arch-indep packages have an architecture field in
debian/control set to any instead of al
Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:11:39 +0400
*Approval-Account-Statement*
Security Control Number: 7132-4865-9260-8509
Offer Expiration Date: 08/22/04
Interest Ra t e: 3.05%
Maximum Available Amount: $246,465
Description:
Our central office has authorized me to send you app rov a l
of your loan based
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Eric Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-25 02:29]:
> > > Upstream Author : Kalle Wallin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > * URL : http://hem.bredband.net/kaw/apps/ncmpc
>
> The requested URL /kaw/apps/ncmpc was not found on this server.
Oops.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 209012 ITP: alsa-tools -- Various tools for the ALSA sound system
Bug#209012: RFP: alsa-tools -- Various tools for the ALSA sound system
Changed Bug title.
> owner 209012 !
Bug#209012: ITP: alsa-tools -- Various tools for the ALSA sound system
Upstream has started to use FLTK 1.2 branch for its new development
version giac-0.4.0. Thus, as soon as libfltk1.2 is available in Debian,
giac GUI will depend only in libraries already packaged.
--
_
Carlos Enrique Carl
hi,
you have found one:) what can I do ?
Riccardo
pgpi4BBvGqq20.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cavewall
Version : 0.25
Upstream Author : Kuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.tdi.pozman.pl/osh/cavewall/
* License : GPL
Description : a colored ASCII visual editor
CAVE WALL (Colored ASCII Visual
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: spe
Version : 0.5.1.e
Upstream Author : Stani Michiels
* URL : http://spe.pycs.net/
* License : GPL
Description : a very powerful python IDE
Spe (Stani's Python Editor) is a Python IDE with auto-indentatio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: clash
Version : 1.0-rc2
Upstream Author : Davide Rao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/bclash/
* License : GPL
Description : a tool to make bootable Compact Flash systems
Clash is
71 matches
Mail list logo
