Your message dated Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:51:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closing outdated RFPs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at quiet) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2000 00:12:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 31 19:12:57 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmagallo by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 13JPg0-0000OG-00; Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:12:56 -0500
From: "Bdale Garbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: "Bdale Garbee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: paxutils
X-Mailer: feedbts -- Flames to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Marcelo Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 19:12:56 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Submitted: 19981125
The person listed as the submitter of this bug has stated his intention to
package paxutils.
If you are interested in this package, and the ITP was submited a long time
ago (3 months or so), the prospective maintainer can be reached via
[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you contact him, please remember to be
polite, Debian maintainers are volunteers, and Read Life has the nasty habit
of getting in the way. Once you upload the package and it's installed on the
archive, please remember to close this bug (or include a Closes: bug#nnnnn
statement on your changelog).
This report was automatically fed into the BTS database. The original
submission date to the WNPP system was 19981125.
You are getting a copy of this mail because your emai address was
listed on the WNPP as the person who submited the original request to the
system.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 68145-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Aug 2004 10:52:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 25 03:52:02 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de) [193.22.164.111]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BzvNp-0000Oi-00; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 03:52:02 -0700
Received: from pd9e18a03.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.225.138.3] helo=legolas)
by vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de with asmtp
(TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1BzvNm-0003j1-Uc; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:52:00 +0200
Received: from jmm by legolas with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BzvNf-0000le-6n; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:51:51 +0200
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 12:51:50 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040803i
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.225.138.3
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closing outdated RFPs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on vserver151.vserver151.serverflex.de)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
This RFP has been closed as it is very old and the requested program
isn't even under active maintenance since at least two years. If the
program is really important to you, please revive it upstream first.
Cheers,
Moritz
