Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 01:25:48 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145313: fixed in gtk-engines-mac2 1.0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 01:37:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#117996: fixed in chrootuid 1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 01:39:56 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145590: fixed in cgitb 20020502-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 02:06:47 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#133434: fixed in xbvl 2.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 141950 + fixed
Bug#141950: ITP: irc - The original IRC daemon
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 130210 + fixed
Bug#130210: ITP: gnutrition -- nutrition analysis software for GNOME
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 02:09:49 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#144551: fixed in libcrypt-cbc-perl 2.03-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 02:10:22 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#144509: fixed in libcrypt-rijndael-perl 0.05-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 02:25:36 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#116937: fixed in kernel-patch-lkcd 4.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 02:24:31 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145692: fixed in d-shlibs 0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 02:37:40 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146273: fixed in wavsplit 0.1.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 02:52:14 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#144349: fixed in svtools 0.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 02:58:39 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146677: fixed in wmtimer 2.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 03:07:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146161: fixed in socat 1.0.4.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 03:16:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146390: fixed in opendchub 0.6.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 03:14:21 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146555: fixed in xmms-ladspa 0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 03:27:23 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#143281: fixed in scummvm 0.2.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 03:28:15 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146966: fixed in zwm 0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 03:25:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#146993: fixed in ccmsn 0.3p3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 03:33:34 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#147112: fixed in sitemap 2.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 03:33:43 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#147114: fixed in sitemap-perl 1.13-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Tue, 21 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: N/A
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name : fortunes-fr
> * Description :
> A collection of French fortune cookies, from various sources:
Nice. Please make sure you had a look at fortunes-de and its
wrapping machanism for
Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 14:02:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
File::Rsync from CPAN, Perl Convenience wrapper for the rsync(1) program
--
_ivan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mtools
Package: wnpp
I'm orphaning mtools. As it turned out, I'm not interested in mtools much,
and I don't own much floppy drive hardware to test with.
Priority: standard
Section: otherosfs
Installed-Size: 412
Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 147794 ITA: mtools - Tools for manipulating DOS files
Bug#147794: O: mtools - Tools for manipulating DOS files
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 147794 ITA: mtools -- Tools for manipulating MSDOS files
Bug#147794: ITA: mtools - Tools for manipulating DOS files
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-22
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xdms
Version : 1.3
Upstream Author : Andre Rodrigues de la Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ee.tut.fi/~heikki/xdms/
* License : Public domain
Description : An un
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 140484 RFP: privoxy -- Privacy-enhancing proxy, based on Junkbuster
Bug#140484: ITP: privoxy -- Privacy-enhancing proxy, based on Junkbuster
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debia
Le Mercredi 22 Mai 2002 11:10, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, 21 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Version: N/A
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name : fortunes-fr
> > * Description :
> > A collection of French fortune cookies, from various sources:
>
> Nice. Please ma
On Fri, 2002-05-17 at 16:56, Marc Leeman wrote:
> * Package name: winex
> [...]
> This version of the TransGaming Wine Branch [...]
I'd like to register my objection to this package being installed, even
in non-free. As a Transgaming subscriber and supporter of their work, I
don't want to see
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:40:59PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> > * Package name: winex
> > [...]
> > This version of the TransGaming Wine Branch [...]
>
> I'd like to register my objection to this package being installed, even
> in non-free. As a Transgaming subscriber and supporter of their work
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to register my objection to this package being installed, even
> in non-free. As a Transgaming subscriber and supporter of their work, I
> don't want to see Transgaming's work be diluted, and I imagine that many
> people feel similarly. I urge the pr
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 22:32, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> If it has a license appropriate for inclusion in Debian, or the
> non-Debian nonfree archive, and there is a developer interested in
> maintaining Debian packages in accord with the usual rules, we should
> do so.
Yes, I agree. But I also
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, I agree. But I also said "I urge the prospective maintainer to
> reconsider." because I recognise that it's totally up to the prospective
> maintainer. I personally don't wish it to be included, but can't do a
> whole lot if the maintainer sees different
35 matches
Mail list logo