Your message dated Wed, 22 May 2002 02:24:31 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#145692: fixed in d-shlibs 0.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2002 14:54:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 03 09:54:59 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kfep06.dion.ne.jp [203.181.105.168]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 173eSZ-0002Kx-00; Fri, 03 May 2002 09:54:59 -0500
Received: from vivare ([218.222.59.170]) by kfep06.dion.ne.jp with SMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Fri, 3 May 2002 23:54:26 +0900
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 23:45:02 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Subject: ITP: d-shlibs (Re: Bug#145569: ncurses: wrong dependency on libc6-dev)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
I intend to package d-shlibs, a collection of shared-library packaging
helper scripts to demonstrate that most of shared library packaging
practices currently done manually can be automated.
This is more of a proof-of-concept collection of scripts, which
would be better off being folded back to dpkg, and debhelper, if
possible.
> > I'm moving this discussion over to -devel,
> > because this topic is not restricted to ncurses only.
>
> I think we should just implement versioned depends and have
>
> Depends: glibc-dev (= foo)
>
> I say "glibc-dev" because we have another libc for the *BSD ports, so
> it will probably be something like this in the future:
>
> Depends: glibc-dev (= foo) | bsdlibc-dev (= bar)
No, that wouldn't scale.
I believe that the most undesirable part of current
library packaging is that the Depends: field of
development libraries are not automatically handled,
although it should be possible to do that.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 145692-close) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2002 06:38:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 22 01:38:11 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17APlD-0000My-00; Wed, 22 May 2002 01:38:11 -0500
Received: from rdonald by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17APXz-0007um-00; Wed, 22 May 2002 02:24:31 -0400
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.14 $
Subject: Bug#145692: fixed in d-shlibs 0.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Randall Donald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 02:24:31 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
d-shlibs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
d-shlibs_0.1.dsc
to pool/main/d/d-shlibs/d-shlibs_0.1.dsc
d-shlibs_0.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/d-shlibs/d-shlibs_0.1.tar.gz
d-shlibs_0.1_all.deb
to pool/main/d/d-shlibs/d-shlibs_0.1_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated d-shlibs package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 22:39:12 +0900
Source: d-shlibs
Binary: d-shlibs
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
d-shlibs - Debian shared library package building helper scripts
Closes: 145692
Changes:
d-shlibs (0.1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial Release. Close ITP: (closes: 145692)
Files:
4fba5c75cbf4a9a9cfcee266b5faf0f2 555 utils optional d-shlibs_0.1.dsc
19006d236879310645bc2ae4f3d90745 13158 utils optional d-shlibs_0.1.tar.gz
7380d8670da8f8c377f63981779047c1 6736 utils optional d-shlibs_0.1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: KUHASIKU WA http://www.gnupg.org/ WO GORANKUDASAI
iD8DBQE81992MFm/ks03VvQRAkOHAJ4tAbVJ5yf4KWKwlqg3a7c4C1JnLgCfRPhv
r8M/vybYSm/e1yb0qtmzGTE=
=Y/UZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
