Hi,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:53:27PM +0200, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
> >> Maybe it should not be described as "free" if it is indeed non-free?
> > Well, it is "free" under some definition of free, but you are right that
> > this might be misleading. Perhaps "freely available" would be better?
Matthijs Kooijman writes:
>> Maybe it should not be described as "free" if it is indeed non-free?
> Well, it is "free" under some definition of free, but you are right that this
> might be misleading. Perhaps "freely available" would be better?
Freely distributable maybe?
> At any rate, we've up
Hi Timo,
> Maybe it should not be described as "free" if it is indeed non-free?
Well, it is "free" under some definition of free, but you are right that this
might be misleading. Perhaps "freely available" would be better?
At any rate, we've uploaded the intial release already, so we'll have to f
Maybe it should not be described as "free" if it is indeed non-free?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84ocjd3ejv@sauna.l.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Matthijs Kooijman
* Package name: openttd-opensfx
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Various
* URL : http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/opengfx
* License : Creative Commons Sampling Plus
Description : a free sound s
5 matches
Mail list logo
