Matthijs Kooijman <matth...@stdin.nl> writes: >> Maybe it should not be described as "free" if it is indeed non-free? > Well, it is "free" under some definition of free, but you are right that this > might be misleading. Perhaps "freely available" would be better?
Freely distributable maybe? > At any rate, we've uploaded the intial release already, so we'll have to fix > this in a subsequent upload after it went through NEW. Sure it is not a critical bug at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/84sk8p1np4....@sauna.l.org
