On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:19:59AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we should give the community more time for adopting upstream
> > before removing the package entirely. Finally, it doesn't have open
> > RC-bugs. Until there is an urgent need, the pressure for potential
> > upstream ado
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 04:21:47PM +0200, Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > At the moment I'm leaning towards (2). The reasons are:
> [...]
> >- major functionality in the program (ie, playing the score I'm
> > editing) has never worked for
* Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-27 16:21]:
> I'm for keeping the package, especially in sarge. Finally, stable
> releases are generally not changed (except for security, legal or
> other important fixes) during their lifetime, so it doesn't matter
> much if the package is maintained ac
Hi,
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> At the moment I'm leaning towards (2). The reasons are:
[...]
>- major functionality in the program (ie, playing the score I'm
> editing) has never worked for me, maybe because I don't have a
> sound card with a good MIDI synthesizer.
That shouldn't be
4 matches
Mail list logo
