* Roland Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-27 16:21]: > I'm for keeping the package, especially in sarge. Finally, stable > releases are generally not changed (except for security, legal or > other important fixes) during their lifetime, so it doesn't matter > much if the package is maintained actively upstream.
I would agree if this package had been part of woody. However, it wasn't, and so we'd release this package new with sarge and people might start using it even though it's basically unsupported both by upstream and in Debian. This is not ideal, especially since there are apparently other alternatives they could use. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
