Andreas Barth wrote:
> The mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> in d-d
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200302/msg5.html
> seems to have a different opinion for ifupdown, and I don't
> see reason why this should be different between ifupdown and
> resolvconf.
There is no difference
* Thomas Hood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030810 22:05]:
> On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 21:32, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I would ask for the package to provide a virtual package. That would
> > it make much easier if there might arise the need of having two
> > different packages with the same interface to the re
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 21:32, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I would ask for the package to provide a virtual package. That would
> it make much easier if there might arise the need of having two
> different packages with the same interface to the rest of debian at
> any future time. Introducing a virtual p
* Werner Heuser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030809 11:05]:
> Resolvconf is already packaged for Debian, but there are
> wrinkles to work out. The upstream author is willing to share
> packaging duties. Note that the earlier ITP of this package
> (#203131) was withdrawn.
> [...]
I would ask for the pac
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-09
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: resolvconf
Version : 0.35
Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://alioth.debian.org/projects/update-resolv
* License : GPL
Description : Nameserve
5 matches
Mail list logo
