* Thomas Hood ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030810 22:05]: > On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 21:32, Andreas Barth wrote: > > I would ask for the package to provide a virtual package. That would > > it make much easier if there might arise the need of having two > > different packages with the same interface to the rest of debian at > > any future time. Introducing a virtual package now doesn't have > > negative impacts, but has very positive on future possibilities.
> I don't see the need for that. The other package can do: > [...] The mail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in d-d http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200302/msg00005.html seems to have a different opinion for ifupdown, and I don't see reason why this should be different between ifupdown and resolvconf. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
