On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> Is there a policy against changing upstream's package name ? I wouldn't
No. Some upstreams are known to name things very foolishly...
> like to go against policy. Anyway, if I really change the package name,
> it would be better if I put a note somew
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:00:01AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> > * Package name: admuser
>
> Would you consider renaming the package to admwebuser? admuser is a bit too
> generic IMHO...
Good point, admwebuser is a good name and
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Andre Luis Lopes wrote:
> * Package name: admuser
Would you consider renaming the package to admwebuser? admuser is a bit too
generic IMHO...
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-12-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: admuser
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Pedro Lineu Orso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://web.onda.com.br/orso/admuser.html
* License : GPL
Description : Manage Squid or W
4 matches
Mail list logo
