On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 12:00:01AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Andre Luis Lopes wrote: > > * Package name : admuser > > Would you consider renaming the package to admwebuser? admuser is a bit too > generic IMHO...
Good point, admwebuser is a good name and I think it is a better name than the upstream name. However, I personally know a lot of people which does use this package and knows it only as admuser. Is there a policy against changing upstream's package name ? I wouldn't like to go against policy. Anyway, if I really change the package name, it would be better if I put a note somewhere in its long description commenting about that change and including admuser somewhere so an apt-cache search admuser will list admwebuser. What do you think ? Also, should I file another ITP or this one is enough ? -- André Luís Lopes andrelop at ig dot com dot br Debian-BR Project http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br Public GPG KeyID : 9D1B82F6 Keyserver : wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
pgpuL61RX6bJS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
