On Sun 2025-02-09 10:52:47 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I agree with this sentiment, and with my Release Team hat on, I don't
> think we want to have three implementations in trixie. You should work
> with the maintainer to try and get it updated if possible, and
> otherwise maybe it can
Hi Simon--
It's pretty clear from the discussion on debian-devel that we disagree
on the merits of injecting non-consensus LibrePGP artifacts into the
existing OpenPGP ecosystem, so i'm not going to discuss that directly in
this ticket.
I also don't think having three different versions of GnuPG
GnuPG 2.4 introduces a new daemon for TPM 2.0 support: tpm2daemon.
Please note that the similar scdaemon was packaged separately in
Debian.
Fedora on the other hand includes both binaries without separate
packages.
Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Simon Josefsson
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: gnupg24
Version : 2.4.7
Upstream Author : Werner Koch, et al
* URL : https://www.gnupg.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
4 matches
Mail list logo
