Bug#1074463: Bashbro

2024-09-16 Thread Soren Stoutner
Adam, On Monday, September 16, 2024 10:31:48 AM MST Adam Danischewski wrote: > Hi Soren, > > I missed a few comments, sorry about that. I've updated the version on the > upstream to reflect the debian version and added the doc file. > > The other comments were addressed as far as I know, if ther

Bug#1074463: Bashbro

2024-09-16 Thread Adam Danischewski
Hi Soren, I missed a few comments, sorry about that. I've updated the version on the upstream to reflect the debian version and added the doc file. The other comments were addressed as far as I know, if there is anything else please let me know. Latest (1.12) is uploaded to mentors. Thanks, +A

Bug#1074463: Bashbro

2024-09-16 Thread Soren Stoutner
Adam, Did you read over the several other comments? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076655#152 On Monday, September 16, 2024 8:42:09 AM MST Adam Danischewski wrote: > Hi Soren, > > Last I heard, you asked for me to remove the debian/files file from Salsa. > I did and responde

Bug#1074463: Bug#1076655: Bug#1074463: bashbro

2024-09-07 Thread Soren Stoutner
Adam, One additional comment: Your source tree contains a debian/files. This is an autogenerated file created (and deleted) during build. Running sbuild removes it, but to be clean you should probably remove it from Salsa. See: https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-source.html#gener

Bug#1074463: Bug#1076655: Bug#1074463: bashbro

2024-09-07 Thread Soren Stoutner
Adam, Debian/copyright must specify a license for each entry. The one for debian/* is missing. W: bashbro source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright License [debian/copyright: 10] N: N: The paragraph in the machine readable copyright file is missing a field N: that is required by the specific

Bug#1074463: Bug#1076655: Bug#1074463: bashbro

2024-09-07 Thread Soren Stoutner
Adam, Thank you for going into detail on these. I find your analysis and examples to be persuasive. As I mentioned in a previous email, I think it would be easier to maintain the Debian package if the packaging repository were converted to the gbp format. However, doing so is not a requireme

Bug#1074463: Bug#1076655: Bug#1074463: bashbro

2024-09-05 Thread Soren Stoutner
Adam, Thank you for your response below. I have comments on three subjects. 1. Some people feel that programs should not be accepted to Debian if they aren’t unique enough or if they are too ambitious. Although I feel this is an important question for an upstream developer to ask themselves,

Bug#1074463: bashbro

2024-09-04 Thread Soren Stoutner
John, Those are some good comments. Thanks. On Wednesday, September 4, 2024 6:35:33 PM MST John Goerzen wrote: > Hello, > > Adam recently contacted me as a random DD, as he was interested in > getting Bashbro into Debian. As a courtesy to the others that have > visited with him about it, here

Bug#1074463: bashbro

2024-09-04 Thread John Goerzen
Hello, Adam recently contacted me as a random DD, as he was interested in getting Bashbro into Debian. As a courtesy to the others that have visited with him about it, here is an excerpt of my response. Hi Adam, That's a pretty neat concept! I'm impressed - HTTP serving in bash. It wouldn't h